Talk:Lewis Ginter Botanical Garden

Virginia Low‑importance

	Virginia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Horticulture and Gardening

	Gardening portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Horticulture and Gardening on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Horticulture and GardeningWikipedia:WikiProject Horticulture and GardeningTemplate:WikiProject Horticulture and GardeningHorticulture and gardening articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Richmond, Virginia (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Richmond, Virginia, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Richmond, VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject Richmond, VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject Richmond, VirginiaRichmond, Virginia articles

Article tone

What happened to this article? This seems like someone copy and pasted from the website. I understand the enthusiasm, but it seems like an advertising - complete with a phone number in the text? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Terrenjpeterson (talk • contribs) 02:47, 26 May 2008

An overzealous employee or fan I suppose, I've added a cleanup tag. -- MiG (talk) 08:54, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've acted on that cleanup tag, improving the tone to a more encyclopedic one. I looked to see if this text was copied from some copyright source but didn't find any. It appears to be an editor who meant well but ended up including a lot of original research which was incorrectly tagged as coming from a single brief history page on the official website. The previous version, particularly the history section, read more like a promotional brochure for the property and biography of the family. The language has been made more neutral, more references used and cited, and appropriate links added to Ginter's existing biographic article.--MadeYourReadThis (talk) 16:54, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lewis Ginter Botanical Garden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090124104306/http://richmondwiki.org/wiki/Lewis_Ginter_Botanical_Garden to http://www.richmondwiki.org/wiki/Lewis_Ginter_Botanical_Garden

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:47, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]