Talk:Lew Childre

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

keep, 8 July 2016, see discussion.
no consensus, 24 April 2016, see discussion.
keep, 3 October 2013 (UTC), see discussion.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Skepticism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Call for contributers

Please assist in the development of this page.

Notice! I have e-mail Doc Childre's organisation for more details about the man and his back ground. I will be adding this information as it comes in. Benjaminw w (talk) 21:20, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notability issue

Moved from User talk:Meco:
<move begin>
Not getting you, have read WP:BIO twice now. And I am not seeing any problems with notability. maybe you need to be a bit more clear with you objection. WP:BASIC covered. WP:ANYBIO covered WP:CREATIVE covered.

I need your objection defined clearly. Or are you just trying to bully me? Benjaminw w (talk) 13:34, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
<move end>

For starters, it would help if Childe was referred to in a reliable source. One source is presently listed that is not Childe himself. It is listed as Psychophysiological Correlates of Spiritual Experience, Biofeedback; 29(4):13-17. Childre D, McCraty R (2001). Is this a scientific journal called Biofeedback? I am unable to find this on googling "Biofeedback journal". You need to add some additional reference so that I am able to verify this source, such as a url or issn number. And I might add, even if this is a mainstream scientific journal, this independent source alone would not be sufficient to satisfy the notability requirements. __meco (talk) 14:21, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello everyone,

I have located that journal. It appears to be scientific, as I found it through the local University library. Apparently issues from 2001 to 2008 can be read for free by everyone, online (more recent ones only for Assiciation members). I also located that article which is cited in the W.P. article on Mr Childre ('only had a glance at it though, for lack of time).

Here you are:

Biofeedback. Published by the Association for Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback. Wheat Ridge, Colorado.

Print edition: ISSN 2158-348X

Electronic edition: E-ISSN 1081-5937

Annual volumes (4 issues each). Vol. 36 is of the year 2008; Vol. 29 = 2001 (i.e. containing the literature source cited in the W.P. article).

Access via Scientific libraries or via the Association Homepage directly.

Good luck and kind regards, -- 147.142.186.54 (talk) 17:47, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have now also provided a link to the online version at the references section of the W.P. article, so it will be more convenient for everyone. -- 147.142.186.54 (talk) 16:32, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Addition: I noticed that several of his books have also been translated (German is the one I saw; that is not surprising since the second largest book market in the world - or at least "western" world - is in that language, as far as I know; other versions may exist as well). I am meaning to say: the more widespread someone's thoughts have become, the more relavant he looks for an encyclopaedia, does he not? / What his ideas may be worth is of course a completely different question... -- 147.142.186.54 (talk) 17:43, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I needed this

That's great Meco, I am working on all that you have said, it seams like he is a very shy man and there is little or no info on the web. I have been able to get hold of one of the other scientist a Dr Bradley, as soon as I get the information you asked for I will pop it on the page. hopefully it with be more than one article let see what I come up with.

BTW how do I get hold of ISDN or ISSN number from a published article?

Benjaminw w (talk) 17:36, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I solved the ISSN problem - see above. -- 147.142.186.54 (talk) 15:52, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Childre Doc.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

The following images, used in this article, have been nominated for deletion:

File:Childre Doc.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
File:Childre doc.gif has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Childre Doc.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 23:48, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

His Homepage

You can find his homepage under www.heartmath.org . -- 147.142.186.54 (talk) 18:13, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

For easier reference: http://www.heartmath.org --147.142.186.54 (talk) 18:16, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Widely accepted by the medical community"

This article directly contradicts this one: Heartmath Institute, additionally one article does not mean wide acceptance. Lairzoo (talk) 15:39, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Credentials

What are his credentials? Can't find them via google.com or his website… 12.180.133.18 (talk) 11:24, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

He doesn't have any. Chamberlian (talk) 06:00, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Doc"

If Doc is his given name, it shouldn't really be listed like a nickname?Chamberlian (talk) 06:00, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References are dead links

The original links for sources all point to credential-locked webpages, and all the archive links in the reference section point to webcitation pages with dead DB connections. Very problematic for an article that espouses such fringe views? Could somebody more familiar with the article history / subject matter please address this? ƒin (talk) 09:39, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

webcte has been down a while it may or may not come back. There's nothing preventing someone from switching to archive.org or archive.today if they feel it is important. -- GreenC 14:20, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]