Talk:Levelling Up White Paper

This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page:
• Levelling-up policy of the Conservative government
Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at:
• Talk:Levelling-up policy of the Conservative government

Wikipedia

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's encyclopedic coverage of itself. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. Please remember to avoid self-references and maintain a neutral point of view, even on topics relating to Wikipedia.WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject WikipediaWikipedia

United Kingdom

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom

Plagiarism

The term "plagiarized from Wikipedia" is not nom-neutral, and should be restored. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 09:12, 4 February 2022 (UTC).[reply]

I have deleted the sub-section on "Plagiarism" as it is repeated text (even down to repeating article citation) and gives one specific aspect of the criticism of the White Paper undue weight (WP:RSUW). I have re-added your use of the word "plagiarised" back in the text under the "Reception" subheading, as part of the wider paragraph of texts being taken from other sources. Hopefully this is satisfactory to everyone. Please do not revert the deletion of the "Plagiarism" subheading. BillyDee (talk) 11:27, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]