Jump to content

Talk:Les Misérables (2012 film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeLes Misérables (2012 film) was a Media and drama good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 20, 2011Articles for deletionKept
January 20, 2014Good article nomineeNot listed
March 3, 2014Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Former good article nominee

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Les Misérables (2012 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:30, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Post Production

[edit]

Simon Hayes shouldn't be in that part, as that wasn't his role! He was for the filming itself. He was their PSM after all. Thus it is very weird to see all that info under the post production category in the article itself. Mathmo Talk 02:48, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Taylor Swift's involvement in another Hooper film

[edit]

I just saw early today that information about Taylor Swift eventually doing one of Tom Hooper's films Cats after not getting the role of Eponine was deleted. The reason why I added that information was because the articles for Cinderella and Dumbo say that Emma Watson and Will Smith were in the running for the lead parts in those respective movies, but they ultimately ended up not playing those roles. The articles say that Watson and Smith went on to instead do Beauty and the Beast and Aladdin, respectively. Should those bits of information from those article be deleted as well? Or should the information about Swift's involvement in Cats be added back into this article? And1987 (talk) 19:31, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Non-RS

[edit]

I would suggest that the Showbiz411 ref be deleted, as Showbiz411 is not an RS, per Wikipedia:USERGENERATED and WP:SELFPUB. --2603:7000:2143:8500:DDB2:A4E1:CCC1:91F3 (talk) 05:15, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]