Jump to content

Talk:Leonard of Noblac

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

St. Leonard in Black Adder

[edit]

Is it realy relevant to understanding St. Leonard to see how he is venerated in Black Adder? Shall we include here in this article a list of every television show, novel, song, film, commericial, magazine, and play that mentions St. Leonard? What would be the point? I imagine for St. Leonard that the list would not be over long, but what precedent does that set? What if we did the same for St. Peter or even St. Nicholas/Santa Claus?

I think the Black Adder content is appropriate to a Black Adder article, but does not contribute to an article about St. Leonard. It is a one-way reference.imars (talk) 07:58, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Blackadder reference isn't even clearly related to this particular St. Leonard, and is seemingly unrelated, as it claims he's a eunuch. Maybe its a reference to some other St. Leonard, I honestly don't know, but I can't think that it's really even remotely appropriate to this article. John Carter (talk) 13:58, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the disputed content moved from the article page: imars (talk) 07:41, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

==In popular media==
The second episode of the 1983 British sitcom The Black Adder features a St. Leonard's Day celebration in which the traditional "frolics" are said to include Morris dancers, eunuchs and bearded women. It is not entirely certain if the program is referring to the "real" St. Leonard, as he is described as having been a eunuch himself.

How sceptical?

[edit]

I'm generally in favour of the sort of "myth and ritual" approach advocated here, with the the myth clearly serving the needs of the pilgrimage centre. This does not necessarily preclude an earlier origin for the cult and the town. Its own literature claims a Gallo-Roman origin, possibly in an estate belonging to a Nobilius family. This would fit well with a missionary working to convert the countryside in the late Roman/early Merovingian period. The details of the myth, though, I am sure are due to the exigencies of the Crusading period, when they seem most relevant.Sjwells53 (talk) 22:12, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder if Leonard is to some extent a culture hero of the smiths, who seeem to have been important in the medieval economy of the town. They would naturally make gifts of chains at the shrine and this might then have led to an interpretation of Leonard as a patron of prisoners. I've no real evidence for this beyond the bare fact that chains are used to garnish the tomb now, and that they are shown in representations of it in earlier times - that and a general feel for the way myth and ritual do sometimes interact. It's just a suggestion for further consideration and research.Sjwells53 (talk) 00:14, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Leonard of Noblac. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:04, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Leonard of Noblac. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:34, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]