Jump to content

Talk:Leif Tronstad/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    To get it up to GA standards, I have done the following:
    • One-sentence paragraphs are not really a good thing, and starting the whole article off with one does not make it any better.
    • For biographies, flagicons should only be used to establish nationality, per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (icons). The overuse of flags drowns the infobox, creating confusion in the mind of the reader.
    • Try to rearrange sentences so that the same word does not appear twice in a row, in two following sentences.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    A small copyedit was all that was needed to pass the GA criteria. Congratulations! Arsenikk (talk) 15:52, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]