Talk:Leif J. Sverdrup
![]() | Leif J. Sverdrup has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
![]() | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 31, 2006. The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that Leif J. Sverdrup was a immigrant from Norway to the United States who became a civil engineer and led the project to build the 17 mile-long Chesapeake Bay Bridge-Tunnel, named one of the Seven Wonders of the Modern World after completion in 1964? |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]Welcome to talk page for Leif J. Sverdrup
Blurb for DYK
[edit]Did You Know
- ...that Leif J. Sverdrup was a immigrant from Norway to the America in 1917 and led the civil engineering project to build the 17 mile-long Chesapeake Bay Bridge-Tunnel, named one of the Seven Wonders of the Modern World after completion in 1964?
GA Review
[edit]- This review is transcluded from Talk:Leif J. Sverdrup/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Ian Rose (talk) 06:16, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- Aside from my usual copyedit, just a couple of things:
- Should The Sverdrup Medal of the Society of American Military Engineers really have capital "t" for "The"?
- No. Removed. Hawkeye7 (talk) 06:55, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- I can handle many of Sverdrup's accomplishments continue to serve their missions, but a silent testimony to his engineering skills sounds a bit like a promotional blurb... ;-)
- Fair enough. After all, we do expect the bridges not to fall down... Hawkeye7 (talk) 06:55, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- Aside from my usual copyedit, just a couple of things:
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- a (fair representation):
b (all significant views):
- a (fair representation):
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
- a (tagged and captioned):
b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA):
c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
- I don't think just repeating the original description found on AWM for the Aitape picture is a great idea; for a start it's partly future tense, which doesn't sit well in an encyclopedic article. At the least, I'd modify "who will control" and preferably drop the anecdotal "who squeezed into Wurtsmith's Lightning".
- Re-phrased. I kind of liked the bit about the big guy squeezing behind the pilot's seat of a P-38. Hawkeye7 (talk) 06:55, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- Heh, you've made me feel bad now - well, I only said "preferably" about removing that bit, so if you really like it... ;-) Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 08:03, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- Re-phrased. I kind of liked the bit about the big guy squeezing behind the pilot's seat of a P-38. Hawkeye7 (talk) 06:55, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- I don't think just repeating the original description found on AWM for the Aitape picture is a great idea; for a start it's partly future tense, which doesn't sit well in an encyclopedic article. At the least, I'd modify "who will control" and preferably drop the anecdotal "who squeezed into Wurtsmith's Lightning".
- a (tagged and captioned):
- Overall:
- a Pass/Fail:
- Interesting character and article; if you can just look at the points noted I'll be happy to pass shortly. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 06:16, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- Tks mate - passed and well done! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 08:03, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- Interesting character and article; if you can just look at the points noted I'll be happy to pass shortly. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 06:16, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- a Pass/Fail:
Rohl controversy
[edit]Cite I added, Hearings Before The Joint Committee On The Investigation Of The Pearl Harbor Attack; Part 29, Proceedings Of Army Pearl Harbor Board. Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office. 1946., contain some discussion around page 2022 on Sverdrup's relationship with Hans-Wilhelm Röhl and the Rohl-Connolly Co. [See Schooner Te Vega] and Pearl Harbor Defense Delay Blame Placed. That very nasty controversy swept up Sverdrup in connection with "partying" and such. He came out pretty well. The others, not so much. Col. Wyman, CoE in Hawaii involved in the Hawaii defenses and South Pacific airfields was damaged. The reference is a large PDF file, 60mb or so here. Palmeira (talk) 13:39, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Leif J. Sverdrup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101130215744/http://same.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=4159 to http://www.same.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=4159
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:38, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Engineering and technology good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles that are good articles
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class biography (military) articles
- Military biography work group articles
- GA-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- GA-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- GA-Class World War I articles
- World War I task force articles
- GA-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles
- GA-Class Cold War articles
- Cold War task force articles
- GA-Class CE articles
- Mid-importance CE articles
- WikiProject Civil engineering articles
- GA-Class biography articles
- Mid-importance biography (military) articles
- GA-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Low-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- GA-Class Norway articles
- WikiProject Norway articles