Talk:Lego Minifigures (theme)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]There is already a 'Lego Minifigure' page. Is there no reason to create or add new theme/page/section regarding to Lego minigures. GoTLG (talk) 09:12, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
- This article is not about general Lego minifigures, but about the new Lego theme, which is called "Minifigures". I understand that it is a bit confusing, but Lego Minifigure is a different subject than Lego Minifigures. I'll see about changing the article name to "Lego Minifigures (Theme)". —Preceding unsigned comment added by EWikist (talk • contribs) 17:24, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
Heavy-handed editing?
[edit]On November 30th 2010 I (as IP# 84.208.114.126) added some information about the figures and packaging to the "Details" section of the article, before that the section consisted of just two sentences. On December 11th another anonymous user (IP# 76.26.140.44) did major modifications to the text, as a "Grammatical cleanup". On one side, English is only a second language to me, so I understand that my text may have been less than perfectly written. On the other side I'm a bit disappointed that my grammar is THAT poor that such extensive editing was necessary. While the new version has more sophisticated language and some places is more to-the-point, I feel it other places sounds a bit over-convoluted. I especially dislike the use of the term "figurine", which I think more describes a small statue than a toy figure. The article on "Figurine" seems to support me in this, as it says "Figures with movable parts, allowing limbs to be posed, are more likely to be called dolls, mannequins, or action figures". So, I'm not writing this to complain, but I would suggest someone looked at both versions in order to possibly combine the best of them both.
BTW, should the "References" and "External links" sections be cleaned up a bit? Right now four of the eight links leads to minifigures.lego.com (#5 and #6 even to the same page), I don't know for how long link #2 will be available (it leads to the shop page for Series 1 which is sold out long ago), and link #7 doesn't work at all. It leads to legowikia.com, but this is just a placeholder page, and there's a space between the dot and the com. The actual lego-wiki entry on these figures is at lego.wikia.com/wiki/Collectable_Minifigures.
Axel Eng —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.208.114.126 (talk) 11:21, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
- Hm. I'll work on cleaning this up a bit over time. Thanks for pointing that out! EWikistTalk 17:33, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lego Minifigures (theme). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100729192722/http://shop.lego.com/Product/?p=8683 to http://shop.lego.com/Product/?p=8683
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:08, 20 December 2017 (UTC)