Talk:Lego Duplo

Lego High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lego, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lego on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LegoWikipedia:WikiProject LegoTemplate:WikiProject LegoLego articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Toys Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Toys, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of toys on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ToysWikipedia:WikiProject ToysTemplate:WikiProject ToysToys articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Toys To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Barbie Queen of the Prom, Eve The Second Genesis CCG, More...
Assess : Rate the Unassessed Toys articles and Unknown-importance Toys articles.
Expand : Expand the doll pages, Expand Larami article
Infobox : Toys articles needing infoboxes
Photo : Request images that are needed from Wikipedia requested photographs of toys to included in each articles.
Stubs : work on stubs in Category:Toy stubs
Other : * Tag the talk pages of Toys-related articles with the {{WikiProject Toys}} banner.
- Help out with articles placed in Category:Toys articles needing attention

New logo

In 2022, they introduced a new logo, so can this be on this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:18D:4700:2D30:9D09:BD9D:692A:CFBB (talk) 19:55, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Size incorrect

The article claims that the duplo bricks are twice the size of normal ones. But that's clearly wrong based on pictures. Twice the length, width, and height does not mean twice the size each duplo brick appears to be about 8 times the size of it's normal equivilent. --68.184.56.57 02:11, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fact tags

Is it really necessary to have all these 'citation needed' tags in this article? The user that added these noted that he/she was tagging EVERY UNSOURCED SENTENCE in the article. This seems rather excessive to me...anyone disagree? -Grammaticus Repairo (talk) 23:52, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

About Source of facts

All year I put in the article from 1969 and forward is found by reading Lego catalogs from 1967 to 2005 from http://www.peeron.com/cgi-bin/invcgis/scans/?ct=1 or lookup a set in http://www.lugnet.com/ I hope this will help someone from make a correct wiki citat. (Klasbricks (talk) 00:47, 21 February 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Green bricks

Why are the green Duplo bricks older than the smaller green Lego bricks? --88.78.2.2 (talk) 14:30, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Studs or knobs?

It may sound like a discussion about the males in your local nightclub, but there does seem to be inconsistency in the article about whether blocks are measured in knobs or studs. It would be nice to get a universal term. danno 01:19, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Actual Size

It would be good to have actual measurements for Lego and Duplo so that someone can define which they have, if unknown. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.99.23.117 (talk) 11:20, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 18 June 2016

Please say "stylized DUPLO" instead of "trademarked DUPLO" in the first line! :) ;) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.68.0.235 (talk) 17:38, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That isn’t true though. The trademark is DUPLO, however the brand is stylized in the logo as “duplo”, all lowercase. JayPlaysStuff (talk) 12:35, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

LEGO Movie 2 spoilers?

Shouldn’t the Duplo creatures be put as the main antagonists of the second LEGO movie, rather than giving away potential spoilers? If someone wants to learn more about the duplo aliens’ role in the movie they can always go to the Wikipedia article for it.

JayPlaysStuff (talk) 12:35, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

When did Duplo gain compatibility with Lego?

Comparing the pictures of Duplo today with the Duplo I played with more than 30 years ago, it appears at some point in time they introduced small little notch cuts on the centre shaft on the underside of Duplo pieces.

It seems that Lego pieces were always compatible with being placed ontop of Duplo pieces. However, it appears Duplo must have gained compatibility with being placed ontop of Lego pieces at some time in their history by having these notches cut on the centre shaft.

If this assumption is correct, does anyone have any sources about when these notches were added?

If this assumption is incorrect, what are the notches for? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Impreziv (talk • contribs) 15:56, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]