Talk:Leglock

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Leglock article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Mixed martial arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mixed martial arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mixed martial arts concepts, events, and biographies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Mixed martial artsWikipedia:WikiProject Mixed martial artsTemplate:WikiProject Mixed martial artsmixed martial arts

Martial arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Martial arts. Please use these guidelines and suggestions to help improve this article. If you think something is missing, please help us improve them!Martial artsWikipedia:WikiProject Martial artsTemplate:WikiProject Martial artsMartial arts

New section

Hey, you can't tell anything from these photos with camouflage clothes !!

-Agreed. I'll work on getting some more detailed pictures in color. Boush 06:37, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lower Half positional fighting

Instruction removed, it was an obvious advertisement. This belongs in an article about positional fighting, you wouldn't put an intructional about the mount in an armbar article. It is largely irrelevent, here we are looking for leglock technique intructionals, if you wish to provide direct links to those that would be more appropriate. However, lower half positional fighting is NOT a leglock. In addition, the link is a blog, with only a small portion devoted to instruction (if at all, I saw none). HolJah (talk) 04:17, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Then you're overlooking the numerous videos posted there from professionals in Sambo and MMA. You've specifically targeted all entries related to Scott Sonnon. Turniptruckfall (talk) 04:20, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please inform me if I discredit him in any way, but there is a history with articles and edits for advertisement purposes surrounding the guy. This may cause me to look in Sambo and leglock related articles with cracked lenses though, so please use the talk and discussion functions here to bring me back to objectivity when warranted. Please do not just undo my alterations without stated reason. Also, showing footage of leglocks in live action is NOT an instructional. Maybe a more fitting heading is in order? Submissions in action perhaps?HolJah (talk) 04:28, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since you're obviously stalking him, you can speak directly to admin. There are numerous videos posted to the site demonstrating many leglocks. Turniptruckfall (talk) 04:30, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lets not make this personal. I believe I have been fair about this whole thing. HolJah (talk) 04:37, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your vandalism of Scott Sonnon related wiki edits demonstrates a personal agenda. All of your attempts have already been independently validated by admin, so you're only looking at banning yourself. Turniptruckfall (talk) 04:30, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have not posted anything untrue of Scott Sonnon. I give what I believe to be more accurate information. Once again, I am open to and waiting for you to convince me otherwise, not for you to warn me about being banned. Is my account created for vandalism or is yours created for misinformation? I would rather not get ask that question, but rather, to ask questions about the validity of the information presented. I have been nothing but up front about my alterations of material. Providing reasons for editing and citation. You seem to be avoiding the question of material but rather ask a question of character. In other words, show me the money, don't show me the bank. HolJah (talk) 04:46, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Advertising deleted. HolJah (talk) 17:10, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Poor Pictures

Could we have the pictures redone with the opponents wearing different clothes?--92.228.234.38 (talk) 14:53, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reillyfornow added a decent image of a sambo achilles leglock, and I think there are some on commons that could be included. — Jdcollins13 (talk) 13:49, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Leglock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120415085045/http://www.ijf.org/rule/rule_referee.php to http://www.ijf.org/rule/rule_referee.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:49, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Leglock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:51, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]