Jump to content

Talk:Legal Services Corp. v. Velazquez/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ironholds (talk) 01:51, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Lead sections should normally have a maximum of 3 sections; recommend consolidating the existing ones.
  • "The district court denied an injunction. This was later affirmed in part and reversed in part by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit; it upheld other restrictions that were challenged but held that the welfare advocacy restriction was unconstitutional" - explain the Court of Appeals judgment more fully.
  • "he court also attacked the fact that the restriction functionally barred participation of attorneys in the courts, as an effect of preventing certain cases from being filed" - this needs to be clarified and explained for the layman.
  • "Justice Scalia dissented from the decision of the court, primarily believing that Rust mandated a ruling upholding the restriction." - "Justice Scalia dissented from the decision of the court, primarily due to a belief that Rust mandated a ruling upholding the restriction."
  • Merge the two paragraphs in "Reaction".
  • "The Legal Services Corporation said they would "immediately review our regulations and then modify them to adhere to the Court's ruling"" - "The Legal Services Corporation said they would "immediately review [their] regulations and then modify them to adhere to the Court's ruling""
  • As a general principle, you need to wikilink a lot more legal terms ;p. Ironholds (talk) 01:51, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Please tell me if there is anything else I should change and thanks for reviewing. :) Lord Roem (talk) 18:32, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • "It first went through the case law relating to Government speech." - should Government be capitalised?
  • "this alleged error was claimed to misguide the rest of the Court's analysis." needs a cite.
  • You need to make clear, the first time his name appears, that Gozdor is the writer of the article.
  • "Lastly, an article" - remove "lastly".
  • Is there any tweakage you can perform on the paragraph beginnings in this section? Everything is "A" "An" "Another" "An" and so on. Ironholds (talk) 18:52, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - Lord Roem (talk) 19:21, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]