Jump to content

Talk:Legal Drug

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Legal Drug Is an amazing shonen-ai story by Clamp. I feel that its low popularity is a real shame. Yet its a comfort for most fans, because alot of anime titles these days have been tarished as there populatiy grows. Im glade Japanese animation is catching on.. but I really do beliveve its growing out of control.. as some fans are younger then 14.

Well Legal Drug is very enterting and gripping. fans of Yaoi and shonen-ai titles should really take a look in to it.


I completely agree, but I don't see what's wrong with liking anime under 14.


I guess because even the tamest of animes can have quite a bit of violence and sexual implications.

Why of course but isn't that what makes it great?

The "shounen-ai" section of this page.

[edit]

Where did CLamp state that this series is not shounen-ai? It doesn't really makes sense, since Kakei and Saiga are in that kind of relationship. Perhaps they meant its not focused on BL? 192.92.81.254 02:15, 4 December 2006 (UTC)Duchessa[reply]

!

[edit]

First off, I'll start by reminding everyone that even the Japanese shake their heads at you & will correct you if you continue to use the outdated term "shounenai." It's BL.

Secondly, of course it was intended. This is CLAMP...the group that not only has homoerotic undertones to every manga they've ever worked on, but spawned from a large CIRCLE (manga group) of BL doujinshika (people who make profit from their black market fan comics). CLAMP themselves that Yukito & Touya of CCS were a couple.

Gouhou Drug finally gives their BL audience & old Clamp Cluster fans what they want; an open & indisputable boy-boy relationship.

WISH was intended to be as inoffensive as possible to readers with gender pairing preferences. The genderless angels were however made to look like boys on purpose. Germany did a much better job of translating it & Tokyopop peeved everyone who read the scanlations online.

^

[edit]

Funny you should mention WISH, since it was revealed in "Drug & Drop" Chapter 15 that Saiga and Kakei are actually Kokuyou and Hisui, and Hisui apparently identifies as male, since he chose to take a male human form even though it's less convenient for his relatinship with "Saiga". Hisui makes it pretty clear in Chapter 18 that they don't want to stand out (it was given as the explanation when Kokuyou was dismayed by "Kakei's" shorter hair), but choosing to be a gay couple would make them stand out more than "Kakei" having long hair; if "Kakei" were a woman it would make things easier for them, but Hisui decided that "Kakei" would be male, and this can clearly only be because Hisui is more comfortable with a male body than a female body.

Also CLAMP's decision to have Hisui state in no uncertain terms, for the record, that "Kakei" is definitely a man seems rather hilariously like a response to TokyoPop's aggressive feminizing of Hisui in WISH.

50.47.80.34 (talk) 17:36, 25 April 2015 (UTC) BloodRaevynn[reply]

Minor Characters Section

[edit]

I have made a few edits to the Minor Characters section :)

The part about Kei originally said "In the manga, she is missing and Kazahaya is trying to find her" However the manga has no reference to her being missing or that Kazahaya is looking for her. Rather, the manga implies that he actually ran away from her.

Following on from this, Tsukiko cannot be missing "like Kei" as Kei is not missing. Additionally, the article says that she is "most likely a relative of Rikuo", however there is no evidence in the manga to either confirm or disregard this statement and it's equally likely that she may be an old girlfriend or merely a close friend.


Chess 77 14:57, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Legal Drug. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:36, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Legal Drug. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:48, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]