Talk:Leeper, Missouri
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Leeper be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. Wikipedians in Missouri may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Leeper, Missouri. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://missouri.mophil.org/wa223ge.htm - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080619182407/http://www.scvcamp469-nbf.com/forrestandfortpillow.htm to http://www.scvcamp469-nbf.com/forrestandfortpillow.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:34, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
Discussion of WT Leeper does not meet content standards.
[edit]Discussion of WT Leeper as of 12 April 2018 does not meet content standards. Discussion uses the words "Blah blah" and is written in first person. Needs updated. More sources would add value. Jwc082 (talk) 21:31, 12 April 2018 (UTC)