Talk:Leduc 022

Leduc 022 has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 31, 2021. (Reviewed version).

Aviation: Aircraft

	Aviation portal This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation
	This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Military history: Aviation / European / French / Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Leduc 022/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Eddie891 (talk · contribs) 22:34, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can attend to shortly Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 22:34, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sources look reliable, prepared to AGF
Is it standard to capitalize "throughout the Fifties " ?

Yes, unless you're using the digits instead.

It's not immediately clear to me what "Intended for service use," service refers to here-- remember that all work in the armed services can be called "service"
I don't understand "and a time to 25,000 metres (82,000 ft) of only seven minutes." -- if it's just me being dull, feel free to explain here instead of in the article

See if my change makes it any clearer

Any information on the cost of the prototype?
Is it really worth putting the sentence under 'Surviving aircraft' as a bullet point?
MOS:ELLAYOUT recommends accompanying an entry in the 'external links' section with a brief description if it isn't clear what it is

Indeed it does.

That's anything from me Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 01:18, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking the time to review it, see if my changes are satisfactory.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:47, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Eddie891:--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:38, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]