Talk:Lecture recording

Citations added

I've added in some research citations, but given that I work in a university currently considering lecture recording, others may feel that I have chosen positive sources to support its use. perhaps someone can find some published evidence against? Melissa Highton (talk) 15:49, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Needs 3rd-part sources

I suggest using reviews from sites like CNET, the Chronicle of Higher Education, or EDUcause. Allens (talk) 16:55, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to advertise

I think we need to abbreviate the "solutions" section to not have the page be so dominated by various promotions of corporate technologies. Otherwise the page becomes a clearinghouse for soapboxing. --Jprg1966 (talk) 16:39, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Material regarding features (and limitations!) that various pieces of software have can be moved into an appropriately-named section pair; the rest can be abbreviated to a simple listing of names of software. Allens (talk | contribs) 19:49, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to me that the information presented in that section is useful, but is loaded with emotional jargon which makes it sound as though each solution provider wrote his or her own blurb. I would like to see the information retained, and only the promotional phrasing corrected. (Perhaps this is what was meant by the previous comment? I'm uncertain ...) RMADLA (talk) 19:10, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lecture recording. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:59, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]