Talk:Leadership Institute

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past.

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I've deleted the following text from this page. This was the entirety of the article as of November 23, 2005.

"The Leadership Institute was founded in 1981 by Morris Sheats. It has trained pastors from all over the world."
I don't think the two organizations are related, but if they are, feel free to elaborate on how. If they are indeed separate organizations, please create a disambiguation page and make appropriate link adjustments. Sorry if this is an inconvenience to whoever wrote this, but this page has not been updated in a while, it is very scant on info and it contains no references. I also feel that the current page is more noteworthy and therefore deserving of the page title.--Hraefen 22:15, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This page needs categorization and I hope one of the stub sorters will find this and do just that.--Hraefen 22:52, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I'd categorize it if I could figure out what it is. "Institute" is a pretty vague term. Is it a club? Is it a school? Please clarify the article. NickelShoe 01:44, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Therein lies the problem. It's kinda like a school in that it teaches people, but it's more in a seminar format as opposed to semesters, dorms etc. Institute is very vague, but that's what it's called. Is there a category for think tanks or something along those lines? That might be the most accurate one, but still a little off the mark. Hopefully some poli sci graduate student will find this and do some magic.--Hraefen 21:07, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

According to the article, the "institute" has an apparent success rate of 0.04%, and half of the "notable" graduates are sufficiently insipid that they have not yet inspired anyone to create articles. Is this a genuinely notable organisation? - Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 22:50, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the New York Times thinks so, as link #1 of the article shows. The Institute is relatively young and many of it's 'graduates' are in their mid-20s and some of the older ones are US senators, congressmen and governors. How is there even a question of notability?--Hraefen 22:43, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This is a multi-million dollar organization headed by a notable political figure that has trained thousands of activists and hundreds of elected officials. It is notable. However, it is important to keep Morton Blackwell's Leadership Institute article apart from other groups using the same name, which are not notable (several colleges have leadership institutes and religious groups run them too). Jcmiller 16:40, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New Edits

I added a link to the organization's website, added a new section clarifying their philosophical stance (Philosophy and Curriculum).

Deleted the sections containing unverifiable quotes from random students and instructors.

Added a short section on their international activities.

Removed an outdated, incorrect, and unverifiable list of guest speakers. We can leave that to the organization's website.

I believe there was an article in the Washington Post about them recently. I will post a link if it's relevant.

--ChadEdwards 19:11, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fundraising and non-partisanship */ re-added recenty deleted SOURCED info: read references before you assume that something is unsourced. The info about Bill Clinton etc is IN the NYT link that is provided as the ONLY reference for this article. Don't be lazy.--Hraefen ^Talk 20:45, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request deletion

Request deletion, does not meet wiki notability standards It is me i think (talk) 03:57, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete this article. The Leadership Institute is almost unknown to liberals, but to conservatives it is very well known and is the rough equivalent to Wellstone Action. I believe liberals will ignore this organization at their peril. I'd like to see the article expanded. 75.25.6.167 (talk) 15:20, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I also oppose deletion (ironic I looked at this a day after the above note, but I am in fact a different person). The Leadership Institute is well known and has been involved in the training of a number of elected representatives, some who credit it significantly for its contribution to their political careers. I don't know if it is to any groups peril if ignored, but it is significant today and was certainly so in the mid 90's. It is unfortunate there is a dearth of source'd material regarding the organization, and I do think some work could be done to improve the articles neutrality. Packetmonger (talk) 00:08, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Leadership Institute. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131300295700/http://www.gop.com/members/virginia/morton-blackwell/ to https://gop.com/members/virginia/morton-blackwell/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:30, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"The LI" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The LI. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. gnu 57 06:51, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"The li" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The li. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. gnu 57 06:51, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]