A fact from Le Roy le veult appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 17 March 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom
I doubt that the gender of the word meaning "king" is feminine in Norman French. (In fact, I am certain that in the Middle Ages one would lose his or her head for referring to the king as "la roy"!) Google Books tends to agree, as there are 11,400 results for Le Roy le veult and 2 for La Roy le veult. Google results are similarly unanimous. Surtsicna (talk) 19:37, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
They may have cut off the head for lèse-majesté, but not, at least not outside a few miscarriages of justice, for a grammatical mistake. They could tell, as we can, whether one aimed at insulting the King or just making a mistake.--2001:A61:20AD:501:7090:49DE:53ED:BC35 (talk) 21:38, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}