Talk:Le Massif

	Sports portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skiing and Snowboarding, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of skiing and snowboarding articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Skiing and SnowboardingWikipedia:WikiProject Skiing and SnowboardingTemplate:WikiProject Skiing and SnowboardingSkiing and Snowboarding articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: Quebec / Sport Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Quebec.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian sport.

Untitled

Check your sources I know Cannon (in New Hampshire) and Killington (in Vermont) more vertical rise than that!!

The above comment is true for Killington, but Canon's vertical is less than Le Massif.

I live near Le Massif in Charlevoix, Québec, Canada, and ski there often. I have edited the article to add more information.

This article is blatant advertising for le Massif. Wikipedia is not free advertising; it is operated by a not-for-profit foundation.

Hopefully this travesty wasn't directly ordered from someone in the resort's corporate management. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.15.226.107 (talk) 01:50, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

False Claim to "Highest Vertical E of the Rockies"

It looks from this site (http://mountainvertical.com/) that both Lake Placid, NY and Sugarbush, VT are higher than Le Massif. Is there some qualifier they're using to weasle out of this? Or is it just empty PR calories? — Muckapedia (talk) 14^e janv. 2016 14h18 (−4h)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Le Massif. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927062317/http://www.firsttracksonline.com/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=641 to http://www.firsttracksonline.com/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=641

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:08, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]