Talk:Lawsonella

Microbiology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microbiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microbiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrobiologyWikipedia:WikiProject MicrobiologyTemplate:WikiProject MicrobiologyMicrobiology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

On 28 October 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Lawsonella clevelandensis to Lawsonella. The result of the discussion was moved.

Requested move 28 October 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Frostly (talk) 06:07, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lawsonella clevelandensis → Lawsonella – There's no WP:MONOTYPICTAXA guideline for bacteria, but I think WP:CONCISE is enough of a reason to move this article from the species name to the monotypic genus name. jlwoodwa (talk) 01:34, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support: Also would be WP:CONSISTENT with other ToL articles. YorkshireExpat (talk) 13:10, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.