Talk:Lawrence Washington (1659–1698)

This article was nominated for deletion on 26 September 2015. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Virginia

	Virginia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Same Person?

Is the picture here : http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/File:Lawrence_Washington.jpg of the same person as the one here : http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/File:Portrait_of_Lawrence_Washington_%281659%E2%80%931698%29.jpg?

Looks like the same person to me.

Who is Lawrence Washington (1659–1698) and who is Lawrence Washington (1718–1752)?

Isenhand (talk) 07:54, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I had that same question. -- Kuzey457 (talk) 21:25, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. It is obviously misidentified. It is of Lawrence Washington (1718-1752), a grandson of Lawrence Washington (1659-1698). As per above. TuckerResearch (talk) 18:57, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This has been fixed by me on Wikipedia and Wikimedia. TuckerResearch (talk) 15:08, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lawrence Washington (1659–1698). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:26, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

“Plantation” changed to “estate” & deleting “enslaving”

User:Beyond My Ken What's the reason for changing "plantation" to "estate?" And wikipedia systemically seems to abhor including designation of enslavers as such, but what's your reasoning?LumaNatic (talk) 23:36, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

LumaNatic: Why don't you keep this discussion centralized at the NPOVN rather than trying to get different answers from different people? Natureium (talk) 23:52, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Beyond My Ken directed me to bring it here.LumaNatic (talk) 23:58, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Really? Where? Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:09, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is what I wrote on AN/I:

Context is everything. Every owner of a planatation in that area during the time periods in question was a slave-owner. I am not aware of any plantations (outside of Georgia for a short period of time) which did not use slave labor. Given that, "slave owner" is not a defining characteristic for those who owned plantations at the time, and including that description with no context in the lede of their articles is neither useful nor informative. I do not object to including in the lede the fact that they owned slaves if it is presented with context (see my re-write of the lede of Lawrence Washington (1659–1698)), but saying someone was, for instance, a "lawyer, soldier, politician and slave-owner" is not encyclopedically appropriate. LumaNatic needs to stop that behavior immediately, and work with other editors to include the information in a contextually appropriate manner. Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:50, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

No where on or off of Wikipedia did I tell you to open a discussion here after one had already been opened one up on the same subject at NPOVN. Please do not misrepresent what other editors write, such actions, if repeated, can get you blocked for disruptive editing. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:13, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Marriage date

"In 1688, Lawrence married Mildred Warner, one of three daughters of Mildred Reade ..."

According to the article about Mildred, they married in 1685. --INS Pirat (talk) 21:42, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]