Talk:Lawrence Mead
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Epic preamble
[edit]There is simply too much information that should be placed within relevant sub-headings or removed altogether. It does not summarise this man; rather it attempts to explain a great deal of his most noted work in a superfluous way. As such:
This article may need to be rewritten to comply with Wikipedia's quality standards. |
81.158.173.183 (talk) 13:17, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
- well, his work is what he is known for, not the details of his personal life or his education. Presenting it is not the least "superfluous"--on the contrary, we need more of this in general in articles on academics, rather than the usual bare cv. But this article as it stands is over-promotional in presenting his views, but not discussing the criticism of them. Promotionalism is saying what he wants people to know; encyclopedic writing is what outsiders might want to know, which is every bit as much the reception of his ideas as his own arguments. DGG ( talk ) 22:36, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Lawrence Mead. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081127093449/http://www.napawash.org/resources/news/news_12_8_05.html to http://www.napawash.org/resources/news/news_12_8_05.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100327035900/http://www.aei.org/event/100056 to http://www.aei.org/event/100056
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:34, 18 December 2017 (UTC)