Jump to content

Talk:Lawrence H. Keeley/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) 21:52, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Picking this one up. Review to follow... Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:52, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]
  • Do we know what the H stood for in his name?
  • Consider uploading a Fair Use image of him.
  • Add full name to the first paragraph. I know it is repetitive, but otherwise it is unsourced.
  • the infobox says he got his MA from Oregon, but this is not in the article.
  • Add alumni of University of Oregon to the categories
  • And University of Chicago faculty
  • His thesis is in the infobox but not the article. Add it to the article.
  • Do we know who his PhD supervisor was?
  • Link microwear analysis, lithics on first use in the body
  • Link hominid, stone tool
  • Decapitalise the "P" in "Paleolithic archaeology", A in "Microwear Analysis"
  • "Lawrence Keeley" -> "Keeley" after first mention
  • "Toth later ... but later" Can we avoid one use of "later", perhaps with a different word, to avoid this awkward repetition, where the same word has two contexts in the one sentence?
  • "saw other ways to challenge Keeley's "peculiar view" of anthropology" Like, for example?
  • fn 14: Do we have a doi or ISSN?

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


A solid article. Meets GA standard although I have some issues minor listed above.

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
    B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
    C. It contains no original research:
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    No images
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: