Talk:Law of Kosovo
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Historical Context: Precedence of Laws
[edit]Sorry to complicate things, but haven't you omitted one level of precedence (perhaps because it may seem obvious?).
This is the Constitution, which should be ranked number 1 in your list of precedence. This is of course normal for most countries. But what is unusual is that the Constitution includes the European Convention on Human Rights, even though Kosovo is not yet a party to the Convention, and places the ECHR in a position where it takes precedence over any laws enacted in Kosovo and even over other provisions of the Constitution. This means that the Constitutional Court can override a law passed by the Assembly, which is otherwise in accordance with the Constitution, if it finds that it is not in accord with the ECHR. Markd999 (talk) 20:07, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Law of Kosovo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130317114718/http://www.eulex-kosovo.eu/en/front/ to http://www.eulex-kosovo.eu/en/front/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:58, 18 December 2017 (UTC)