This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome
This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
So I started working on this article out of an interest and affection for Lavinia, and soon realized how Aeneid-focused most of the details are. But due to the nature of the Aeneid as a highly political work, I think we should balance it out with further elaborations on other accounts, and perhaps amending the wording to reflect those (the first section makes statements that are only backed by the Aeneid-- we should change that). I've started on the major references, especially as they relate to Ascanius/Silvius and the contentious Latin line, but I haven't done much yet. I think that Livy's account will work better as a block quote, as he is one of the only ones to describe Lavinia's personality in any depth (I believe, please correct me if I'm wrong). Mshuang2 (talk) 22:29, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]