Talk:Laura Schwartz
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
Clinton
[edit]I wonder if she ever got pursued by Bill, if you know what I mean. :-) -Amit, 05/03/07
Seriously. This entire entry comes from her resume. It probably comes from her own office or someone that works for/with her. I'm all for positive, but who else would keep track or know that she was part of 600+ events? Smart business move on her part, but poor on behalf of wikipedia for not flagging as being biased. Moonshy00 (talk) 00:34, 12 October 2008 (UTC) Moonshy00
Someone post her birthday or at least birthyear. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.229.110.175 (talk) 03:29, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
And a personal section would not hurt either. Whippletheduck (talk) 04:03, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
Recent NY Times article quotes her in December 2009 as being 36. (http://travel.nytimes.com/2009/12/18/travel/escapes/18pools.html) If she became Director of Events in 1997, that meant she would have been 24 at the time she got the job. Highly suspicious, especially since she's an "eight year veteran of the administration, which meant she started in the beginning (1993) at the age of 20. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.178.86.60 (talk) 16:56, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
File:Schwartz cover.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
[edit]An image used in this article, File:Schwartz cover.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 24 August 2011
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 01:10, 24 August 2011 (UTC) |