Talk:Laura Hurd Award
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Links and templates
[edit]Re: this edit:
- The link to Title IX makes no sense; the Laura Hurd award has nothing to do with Title IX.
- The link to NCAA Division III Women's Ice Hockey is unnecessary because it's already linked in the lead sentence.
- The link to National Collegiate Women's Ice Hockey Championship is unnecessary because there's no connection to the Laura Hurd award.
- {{NCAA Division III hockey conferences}} does not link to this article and implies that the Hurd award is tied to the conferences somehow. It is not.
- {{Major women's sport leagues in North America}} makes no sense here, because D-III hockey is not a major sport league.
I request these items be removed. Powers T 03:35, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
- I removed some links to demonstrate my good faith. I do not find really pleasant to work with you LT Powers. Criticizes you constantly my work and my contributions but you brought no new article on the Women Ice Hockey in your country (USA). Nevertheless there is a lot to write, so many good Women Americans players (et canadiennes égalment) play in the NCAA (Division I and Division III) and in the CWHL. It's a pity to have more support of your part. It is a sad situation. Bon dimanche à vous --Cordialement féministe ♀ Cordially feminist Geneviève (talk) 15:05, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
- Excuse me? Maybe you'd care to look and see who exactly created this article. Powers T 15:31, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
- I removed some links to demonstrate my good faith. I do not find really pleasant to work with you LT Powers. Criticizes you constantly my work and my contributions but you brought no new article on the Women Ice Hockey in your country (USA). Nevertheless there is a lot to write, so many good Women Americans players (et canadiennes égalment) play in the NCAA (Division I and Division III) and in the CWHL. It's a pity to have more support of your part. It is a sad situation. Bon dimanche à vous --Cordialement féministe ♀ Cordially feminist Geneviève (talk) 15:05, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
- Yes I know. It is you in March, 2011 that wrote a first stub of the page. Then I leave you the page to you. I shall have wanted to improve it but as this page seems to belong to you, I am going to withdraw this evening and to remove quite my interventions on the page since a few days.I wanted to put two photos but I am going to drop everything. I leave you the free choice (we say in French language: Laisser le bénéfice du doute à autrui ). I am really sad by quite these quarrels with you. It is sad but me little to make nothing furthermore. I am so tired and soooo sad --Cordialement féministe ♀ Cordially feminist Geneviève (talk) 00:59, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
- I am not claiming ownership, only refuting your claim that I "brought no new article on the Women Ice Hockey in [my] country". I have created plenty of articles in this topic area, so you have no right to accuse me of not doing so. But that's irrelevant to whether your contributions are welcome. I encourage you to add content -- pictures, text, whatever -- as long as its accurate and relevant. Powers T 13:09, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Stub-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- Stub-Class Women's sport articles
- Unknown-importance Women's sport articles
- Stub-Class Women's ice hockey articles
- Women's ice hockey task force articles
- Automatically assessed Women's sport articles
- WikiProject Women articles
- Stub-Class Ice Hockey articles
- Stub-Class College Ice Hockey task force articles