Talk:Latin rights

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Latin Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatinWikipedia:WikiProject LatinTemplate:WikiProject LatinLatin articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rome High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rome, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the city of Rome and ancient Roman history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomeWikipedia:WikiProject RomeTemplate:WikiProject RomeRome articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Greg -- I like your discussion of the role of the Latin Right, and its changing nature over the course of Roman time. The only suggestion I would make is to (if you can find enough information) expand on the tenets (not "tenants"), i.e. provide some more detail on the exact rights that are given. Also fix "3nd" --> "3rd". — Preceding unsigned comment added by AnoopKar (talk • contribs) 13:06, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Anoop, the article give a good time line but could use some more features of the Latin right, this would give a better picture of why people actively sought out the title. Also, you mentioned that the status was used as a stepping stone for individuals to become full citizens, are there any instances of colonies initially earning the Latin Right and then gaining full citizenship? Another feature would be including some politicians that influenced the features of the Latin right as well as its distribution. - Tim — Preceding undated comment added 14:17, 15 May 2007‎

Greg, this is a fine article indeed. Like Anoop said, I would like to know just bit more about what exactly these rights were. For example, did they just focus on the two aspects you mentioned or were there other important clauses to them as well? Did they not include a major aspect of Roman law that was guaranteed to a regular citizen? The historical significance you provided was important to understand the whole concept of what exactly these rights were. However, I think the second paragraph seems a bit abrupt after the first paragraph. Maybe you can add a transition line to make it look smoother? As side info, maybe you could also talk about the effect of the Latin Right on the Roman Empire in general and on Latium in particular, in terms of greater cohesion of the society, the promulgation of a common Roman identity or new members in the Senate.- Mustafa — Preceding undated comment added 17:31, 15 May 2007

right v. rights

What is the basis for asserting that 'Latin rights' is either more accurate or more common that 'Latin right' as a translation of ius? This doesn't reflect what I'm finding when I use various search combinations. And ius is singular. Cynwolfe (talk) 14:55, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

recent correction of Latin phrase

Just wanted to make a note on an anonymous edit from an IP that corrected ius adipiscendae civitatis per magistratuum to magistratum. The former may have crept in because it seems to have been a typo (!) in the Cambridge Ancient History (double !! here). For the corrected form, see these results. The -uum form is a genitive plural, which should not follow per. Cynwolfe (talk) 14:56, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]