Talk:Lasso of Truth

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by DC Comics work group.

Lariat

Shouldn't this page be named Lariat of Truth? I've created a page named that and redirected it here, but I think Lariat should be the ultimate term. --lightspeedchick 03:26, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The only problem with this is that "Lariat" is not the term currently used. Virtually every reference included here refers to it as either the Golden Lasso or the Magic Lasso. I am not certain where Lasso of Truth comes from. If the page is moved, it should reflect what is given in the references. -Classicfilms 15:51, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of references

Much of this article is unreferenced re: Wikipedia:Verifiability. If references are not added, the unreferenced sections should be moved to the talk page. -Classicfilms 13:04, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly worth leaving it a while and seeing what turns up. I'll do some digging. (Emperor 13:15, 3 November 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Thanks! -Classicfilms 13:34, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lasso of Truth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:45, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Attributing "incorrect" to academic paper without citation

The article states: In a 1997 academic article, psychologist Geoffry Bunn incorrectly reinforces a correlation between the lasso and the systolic blood-pressure test, stating:

Anyone caught in the lasso found it impossible to lie. And because Wonder Woman used it to extract confessions and compel obedience, the golden lasso was of course nothing less than a lie detector [...] Like the lie detector upon which it was modelled, Wonder Woman's Golden Lasso produced truth—and by implication justice and freedom too—through coercion.[5]

(The citation is to Bunn's paper.)

It's very strange to include a paper just to tell us it's wrong, especially when the "correct" interpretation isn't sourced at all.--Jeff (talk) 16:15, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]