This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports articles
Assess : newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
Cleanup : * Sport governing body (this should-be-major article is in a shameful state) * Field hockey (History section needs sources and accurate information - very vague at the moment.) * Standardize Category:American college sports infobox templates to use same font size and spacing. * Sport in the United Kingdom - the Popularity section is incorrect and unsourced. Reliable data is required.
* Fix project template and/or "to do list" Current version causes tables of content to be hidden unless/until reader chooses "show."
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Athletics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the sport of athletics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and join the discussion.AthleticsWikipedia:WikiProject AthleticsTemplate:WikiProject AthleticsAthletics articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Larvik TIF → Larvik Turn & IF – This article was moved in April 2013, because there is a convention for Norwegian sports clubs with the name "Turn & Idrettsforening" to be shortened to TIF. In this case however, I believe the most used name of this club is "Larvik Turn" and thus we shouldn't shorten "Turn" to just a T. Not all clubs with the "TIF" suffix has used "Turn" as a part of their name, but I believe it was used to differ it from their locals rivals Fram Larvik, when they both played in the top league. We also have two other football clubs with the name "Larvik", Larvik Fotball and FK Larvik, so it would be better to have this article named "Larvik Turn & IF" or "Larvik Turn" to avoid confusion, given that that is its most common name. --Relisted. -- tariqabjotu 12:51, 29 June 2013 (UTC) Mentoz86 (talk) 01:56, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Before I give my opinion one way or the other, can you provide some evidence that "Larvik TIF" is not a commonly use name for the club? Or at least that it is not as common as "Larvik Turn"? Based on what you've said, however, I would say that "Larvik Turn" is probably the best alternative name for the page. – PeeJay16:54, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Searching for "Larvik TIF" gives 1,290 hits on google, where "Larvik Turn" gives 154,000 hits, while "Larvik Turn IF" gives 9,870 hits and "Larvik Turn & IF" gives 51,300 hits. "Larvik Turn" alone is used 100 times more than the current title, while the former title "Larvik Turn & IF" is used about 50 times more than the current title. Mentoz86 (talk) 09:52, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
.jpg){kind=small}
