Talk:Largest gold companies

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Mining Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Finance & Investment Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

what do you consider unecessary stat pages ? there are pages for largest companies in the world, largest banks, largest Canadian banks, largest cities, largest countries. there isn't a page listing the largest gold companies. why shouldn't there be a page for that ? there are people interested in that information just as there are people interested in the largest banks in the US, Canada, and they have their own page. I'm not an editor on this encyclopedia page and I know you guys tend to overreact when random people try to force their views so I'm not going to take the template off the page. I'm going to leave that to you. how is it that this encyclopedia doesn't have a page titled 'largest gold companies' ? that's not right.

WP:IINFO. –túrian^patois 00:52, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for more proof on why the page shouldn't be delted. this isn't a long sprawling list, you could apply that argument to many other pages including

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/List_of_countries_by_future_GDP_(nominal)_estimates http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Big_Five_(banks)

it's not hard to understand either. it's very simple but there's also too much information on the page, to consider incorporating it into another article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.7.238.92 (talk) 00:57, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

what would the page merge with

there isn't any other article on the encyclopedia the deals with the companies that make up this sector of the world economy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Grmike (talk • contribs) 01:09, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

i'd like to keep this page and keep improving it

instead of putting up for deletion can people just be patient and see if it gets more interest from other people who want to add to it. none of the articles are perfect when they are first made. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Grmike (talk • contribs) 05:06, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Time element in article

Unlike facts like "Mars is a planet", the market caps fluctuate with time, so statements like "The market cap is" should be avoided. Instead, the table should contain a list of market caps at a particular stated date, such as 31 December 2009. Stephen B Streater (talk) 19:39, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Largest gold companies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:52, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]