Talk:Landscape Institute

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article covers subjects relevant to Landscape architecture

Speculation on LI Page

This page has been edited, removing innacurate information regarding the institute's finances.

The text

"The Landscape Institute is currently undergoing upheaval, as it is virtually bankrupt due to poor financial control during the year 2007-008, which ended with a significant trading loss in spite of record income. - - The Chartered Member, Gabino Carballo, is fighting to have the accounts and expenditure scrutinized, as seen in the GardenVisit.com [1] blog run by Tom Turner, of University of Greenwich."

is speculative, promotes one idividual and links to a blog which is not part of the work or professional purpose of the landscape institute —Preceding unsigned comment added by SteveKCole (talk • contribs) 14:33, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The 06/04/09 ammendment restores the original text and removes the innacurate info

26/05/09 ammendment deleting the entry "In 2008, it became apparent that the Institute was heading for bankruptcy etc, etc" was made for the same reason as the previous ammendment. The user who added this ammendment should also note that Wikipedia is not a news site and should refer to the tenants of use for wikipedia before adding any further comment. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Carlosestevez (talk • contribs)

1/06/09 ammendmentdeleting entry for reasons given above. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Carlosestevez (talk • contribs) 08:32, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could we please have an editorial lock on this page to prevent this repeated addition of pov information. Wikipedia is not a noticeboard or forum and as such is not the place to announce "Members are calling for a new Extraordinary General Meeting". This ongoing addition of current affairs is tantamount to vandalism. --MrJerricho (talk) 13:58, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Landscape Institute. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090701091245/http://www.landscapeinstitute.org/membership/licentiate.php to http://www.landscapeinstitute.org/membership/licentiate.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:53, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]