Jump to content

Talk:Landing at Lae/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Nick-D (talk · contribs) 10:50, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Comments

[edit]

It's good to see a detailed and high-quality article on this significant operation. I have the following comments

Those edits look great, and I'm very pleased to pass the article. I'm looking forward to seeing it at ACR and FAC. Nick-D (talk) 09:46, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's interesting to see that this appears directly after Landing at Anzac Cove at Wikipedia:Good articles/Warfare! Nick-D (talk) 09:50, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your time, Nick. Cheers, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:15, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not at all - I really enjoyed reading and reviewing this one. It's such an interesting battle. Nick-D (talk) 10:21, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment

[edit]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose is "clear and concise", without spelling and grammar errors:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:
    B. Cites reliable sources, where necessary:
    C. No original research:
    D. No copyright violations nor plagiarism:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused (see summary style):
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: