This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egyptological subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient EgyptTemplate:WikiProject Ancient EgyptAncient Egypt articles
We should have an article on every pyramid and every nome in Ancient Egypt. I'm sure the rest of us can think of other articles we should have.
Cleanup.
To start with, most of the general history articles badly need attention. And I'm told that at least some of the dynasty articles need work. Any other candidates?
Standardize the Chronology.
A boring task, but the benefit of doing it is that you can set the dates !(e.g., why say Khufu lived 2589-2566? As long as you keep the length of his reign correct, or cite a respected source, you can date it 2590-2567 or 2585-2563)
Stub sorting
Anyone? I consider this probably the most unimportant of tasks on Wikipedia, but if you believe it needs to be done . . .
Data sorting.
This is a project I'd like to take on some day, & could be applied to more of Wikipedia than just Ancient Egypt. Take one of the standard authorities of history or culture -- Herotodus, the Elder Pliny, the writings of Breasted or Kenneth Kitchen, & see if you can't smoothly merge quotations or information into relevant articles. Probably a good exercise for someone who owns one of those impressive texts, yet can't get access to a research library.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt articles
Talk:Land of Goshen is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Ecology, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve ecology-related articles.EcologyWikipedia:WikiProject EcologyTemplate:WikiProject EcologyEcology articles
This article is part of the WikiProject Limnology and Oceanography to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the inland waters and marine environments. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on limnology- or oceanography-related topics, as well as to ensure that limnology and oceanography articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.Limnology and OceanographyWikipedia:WikiProject Limnology and OceanographyTemplate:WikiProject Limnology and OceanographyLimnology and Oceanography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ancient Near East related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East articles
@Antiquistik: I don't think it's a good idea to redirect a long-standing article without prior discussion, especially when the relationship between the old article and the redirect target won't be obvious to the average reader. You made a bold edit, but someone else objected to it and reverted it. The next step should be discussing the issue, not declaring the reversion "disruptive". A. Parrot (talk) 15:27, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Following on that, I checked the Van Seters source that is cited both here and at Qedarites, and Van Seters considers Redford's etymology for "Goshen" implausible. That means it's not universally acknowledged that the name of Goshen derives from Qedarite rule. (Van Seters says "there is no evidence that the Qedarites actually controlled the Wadi Tumilat" on page 269; unfortunately, the footnote where he says this continues on to the next page, which I can't access with the Google Books preview.) I'm going to revert the redirect. A. Parrot (talk) 16:15, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@A. Parrot: The problem with Van Seters' objection is that there is significant evidence, including archaeological, that the Qedarites did control the Wādī Ṭumīlāt though, as can be verified from the various sources used in the article for the Qedarites, such as Rabinowitz (1956), Ephʿal (1984), and Retsö (2013), which makes Van Seters' objection untenable. In fact, Van Seters' reasoning for his objection, when viewed in the context of the evidence for Qedarite control over the Wādī Ṭumīlāt, only confirms the identification.
Regarding the article itself, I fail to see how it can be allowed to exist in its present form when it barely contains information not sourced directly from the Bible, which is itself hardly a reliable academic source. If the article is not to be redirected to what majority scholarly consensus agrees is the identification of the Land of Goshen, it needs to at least be rewritten using reputable sources. Antiquistik (talk) 16:37, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that it needs to be reworked, but given that even the smallest aspects of biblical stories end up being debated ad nauseam, I feel like there should be enough reputably sourced material for a decent short article. I can cut down the summary of the biblical text, and maybe draw on some of the Exodus-related sources in my possession. But I don't have access to all the scholarship on this issue, and I'm likely to have a terribly busy January, so it may be slow going. A. Parrot (talk) 16:57, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@A. Parrot: Alright, this is an acceptable compromise for me. Although I nevertheless would still favour a redirect to Qedarites should there not be enough material for a stand-alone article, given that Van Seters' objection, as I have pointed out, is untenable, and the majority scholarly consensus agrees on identifying the Land of Goshen with the Qedarite-ruled region of the Wādī Ṭumīlāt whose existence is archaeologically attested. Antiquistik (talk) 17:34, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I've reworked the section that describes the biblical text. I hope my version is satisfactory, but feel free to adjust it if it isn't.
Re: Van Seters, his objections to the Qedarite claim may well seem unreasonable to you or to anyone else who has looked at the evidence, but Wikipedia can't declare his views "untenable" unless a source explicitly says so, in which case it should probably be attributed. A. Parrot (talk) 19:14, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]