Talk:Lance Latham

This article was nominated for deletion on 13 September 2006. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

notability

I am removing the notability tag, referring to the AfD result "keep". Sorted as part of the Notability wikiproject.

The "biography" book seem dubious to me, nevertheless.--B. Wolterding 11:53, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have learned of some issues with this page and will begin to determine what needs to be done to bring it up to standards to avoid it being deleted. Townoak 15:09, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Paul Rader link at the bottom is not to the same Paul Rader mentioned in the article. The link at the bottom is for Paul A. Rader, the nephew of the Paul Rader referenced in the article. Townoak 15:09, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've recently purchased a copy of the Dave Breese book and will look up page numbers there for things like Camp Awana, etc. Townoak (talk) 13:04, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Broken 'See Also' Links

Before we remove every last broken link let us first consider which should be created into articles of their own (like an Art Rorheim page) and which should just be removed from the See Also list because of lack of notability. All are comments welcome. Invmog (talk) 03:57, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the entries in see also were in the article so I linked them and removed the entry from see also. (note: I was working in the edit screen and didn't realize some of them were red links.) RJFJR (talk) 17:04, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See alos entries

The see also section is rather long and it isn't clear why some of the entries are listed. RJFJR (talk) 17:29, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]