Jump to content

Talk:Lamsongkram Chuwattana

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Biography is poorly written and very subjective. Citation is also needed.

[edit]

The match between Lamsongkram and Zhang described in the biography section has no citation at all.

The paragraph is poorly written and very subjective, and even his opponent's name "Zhang" is misspelled.

There is no solid proof that Zhang kicked Lamsongkram on the head after Lamsongkram felt down. I searched the key words "zhang kaiyin lamsongkram chuwattana illegal kick" using Google, and no news report of the alleged illegal kick was found. The only source of the alleged illegal kick was the current page at Wikipedia (including the duplicated pages and cached pages).

From the video of the match, it is hard to tell whether Zhang really kicked Lamsongkram's head at that moment.

From a Chinese news website which I found by searching their names in Chinese, "http://sports.sohu.com/20091219/n269071754.shtml", Lamsongkram's team did protest against the referee and questioned the decision. But the protest was rejected as "after viewing the slow motion pictures multiple times, the referee believed that when Zhang tried to avoid stomping on his opponent and tried to jump over his opponent, his right leg kicked Lamsongkram's shoulder unintentionally". (通过慢动作回放,张开印在对手倒地后为了避免踩踏对手从对手身上越过,右脚的确无意带了一下蓝桑坤的肩部)

Some aftermaths are very subjective and cannot be verified, such as: "Zhan's camp cited Lamsongkram's unacceptable fouls as the reason or "payback" for Zhan's illegal kick." "Lamsongkram faced much humiliation in his home country and abroad as he had most definitely given his people and his art a bad name by losing to a seemingly inferior art and artist."

I suggest this page should be revised. Any statement without verification should be removed. Subjective statements should be re-written. Proper citations should be added.

69.205.221.152 (talk) 05:42, 23 November 2013 (UTC) 11/23/2013[reply]

Thanks for your review and comments. If you have the time, please also consider being Bold and go ahead and edit the article. It might take some time for someone else to come along. --Paul_012 (talk) 07:53, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]