Talk:Lamparello v. Falwell

This article was the subject of an educational assignment supported by WikiProject United States Public Policy and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program.

A fact from Lamparello v. Falwell appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 29 October 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that in Lamparello v. Falwell, Jerry Falwell lost one of the earliest cases of trademark infringement based on cybersquatting?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2010/October.

Wikipedia

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

IP Law WikiProject

This is a part of the IP Law WikiProject. Thanks! LisaFowler (talk) 00:52, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Case name

Shouldn't this be Lamparello v. Falwell, rather than Falwell v. Lamparello? See [1], [2]. TJRC (talk) 01:59, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that's the convention! It's moved and referring wikilinks corrected. Thanks. LisaFowler (talk) 04:11, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know?

This article should be eligible for appearing on the main page as a "Did you know" entry, if you nominate it soon; it is supposed to be nominated within 5 days of being created.

The instructions for nominating it are at Template talk:Did you know. Basically, all need to do is take this code:

{{NewDYKnom| article= Lamparello v. Falwell | hook=... that ? | status=new | author= LisaFowler }}

and write the hook, a concise and interesting bit of info from the article beginning with "... that" and ending with a question mark. The info from the hook has to be present in the article and supported (in the article) with a citation. Someone will double-check to make sure the source says what it's claimed to say. Once you've come up with a hook, add the above code, including your hook following the "hook=" part, to the top of this section of the DYK template talk page. The code will produce an entry formatted like the others. After that, just keep an eye on your entry; if anyone brings up an issue with it, try to address it. I'll keep an eye out as well. If everything goes well, it will appear on the Main Page for several hours a few days from now.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 16:33, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've nommed: T:TDYK#Articles created/expanded on October 20. Feel free to come up with a better hook. TJRC (talk) 20:58, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Lamparello v. Falwell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:51, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]