Jump to content

Talk:Lambada (song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lambada - Stereo Love

[edit]

Removing this from the covers section, there's no evidence that Stereo Love actually samples Lambada. Rodface (talk) 17:51, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Lambada (cover).jpg

[edit]

Image:Lambada (cover).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:30, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just a question

[edit]

Where are the reliable sources which prove Kaoma stole this song from "Los Kjarkas"? If they really exist, please include them to the article. If they don't, we must exclude the accusation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.58.173.178 (talk) 23:29, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Here is one of the many sources that give credit to Bolivian group los Kjarkas as the original lyrics and music writers of this song : http://www.elpais.com/articulo/cultura/Kjarkas/lambada/dolor/elpepicul/19900529elpepicul_17/Tes/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.254.226.153 (talk) 22:50, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is not a Brazilian song, it is a version of "Llorando se fue"

[edit]

I am amuse with this article, this song it is well known that was a copy of "Llorando se fué". Kaoma, lost the trial with los Kjarkas.

This article is confuse. It can not say that this a brazilian song and later say that it is version of the bolivian one. I strongly suggest change the first paragraph.

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:57, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Lambada (Kaoma song) → Lambada (song) — Because that is the ONLY track that has "Lambada". j3j3j3...pfH0wHz 08:40, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Merge with Llorando se fue!

[edit]

The original song (1981) and history of adaptions better at Llorando se fue. "Lambada" was a successful version of another "Llorando se fue" version, the 1984's of the Peruvian group Cuarteto Continental. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.103.31.154 (talk) 10:24, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • no, this deserves its own article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tony Orlando and Dusk (talk • contribs) 20:21, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose: Not a good idea I think. As the title "Lambada" is much more known than "Llorando se fue", WP readers might be surprised by such a change. Moreover, if the merger is performed, the categories "Number-one single in ..." and "Singles certified ..." will appear under the title "Llorando se fue", which would be a source of confusion, as these categories actually belong to the "Lambada" version.

--Europe22 (talk) 20:35, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This article does a poor job explaining the history of the song. Llorando Se Fue came out in 1981, Chorando Se Foi came out in 1986, and yet the article makes it sound like this version from 1989 is the original version. (Not to mention the group that did the 1981 version sued for its unauthorized version.)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Lambada (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:58, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Lambada (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:20, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lambada (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:53, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lambada (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:01, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Lambada_(song)&oldid=1208083816"