Talk:Lalatapa

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Armenia Mid‑importance

	Lalatapa is within the scope of WikiProject Armenia, an attempt to improve and better organize information in articles related or pertaining to Armenia and Armenians. If you would like to contribute or collaborate, you could edit the article attached to this page or visit the project page for further information.ArmeniaWikipedia:WikiProject ArmeniaTemplate:WikiProject ArmeniaArmenian articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Azerbaijan Mid‑importance

	Azerbaijan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Azerbaijan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Azerbaijan-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AzerbaijanWikipedia:WikiProject AzerbaijanTemplate:WikiProject AzerbaijanAzerbaijan articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Geography Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

[Untitled]

the article hasn't any neutral sources on capture of Lalatapa by Azeri forces. and the importance of lalatapa is also questionable. Lkahd (talk) 12:49, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
please do not delete tags without further discussions here at talk. "Gulf Times" page is not found, and AFP official site writes only that "Azerbaijan's army claimed to have snatched control of several strategic locations inside Armenian-controlled territory".[1] Lkahd (talk) 19:35, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- I can still access that Gulf Times page. As for AFP, that statement doesn't exclude the recapture Lalatapa. It could be among those strategic locations. Thus Stratfor's statement also confirms what Gulf Times wrote, until proven otherwise. Brandmeister^talk 21:12, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lkahd, I cited an article from L'Express for a reason. It says: "Un journaliste de l'AFP présent sur la colline de Lala-Tepe a toutefois pu constater que cette position était bien passée sous le contrôle des forces azerbaïdjanaises" which means "An AFP reporter who was present on the Lala-Tepe hill was nevertheless able to note that this position has been decisively placed under the control of Azerbaijani forces". Why is there a need in this the "neutrality" tag and the mention of "Hadrut region" when Armenian forces clearly ceded their position? Parishan (talk) 15:03, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

I propose that Lalatapa be merged into 2016 Armenian–Azerbaijani clashes. The Lalatapa has not enough notability and the only reliable source is related to the 2016 clashes. Most of the text is not confirmed by any reliable sources. The article's size is also too litle as no relable sources to cite. Lkahd (talk) 10:29, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral Normally, such geographic features deserve standalone articles, but in this case I found very little info. Perhaps there are more offline sources about it, such as undigitized paper publications. Brandmeister^talk 17:09, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Merge because it has no notability or content beyond that derived from the 2016 Armenian–Azerbaijani clashes. Tiptoethrutheminefield (talk) 21:11, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Merge no reliable evidence of notability. --Oatitonimly (talk) 03:33, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: It seems to reach the criteria of WP:GEOLAND, notable for the 1994 Nagorno-Karabakh War as well as the 2016 Armenian–Azerbaijani clashes. Therefore, keeping the page separate seems to cleaner. Klbrain (talk) 17:23, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]