Talk:Lakhta Centre

Russia: Technology & engineering / Visual arts / Economy / History / Politics and law Mid‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the technology and engineering in Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the visual arts in Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the economy of Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the history of Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the politics and law of Russia task force.

Energy

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Architecture

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Spelling

Sorry! My summary got cut off! It was: 1) Previous move violated Wikipedia's guidelines on English. (The Wikipedian made reference to this part of Russia being a part of Europe. That is irrelevant.) 2) The developers use the Shakespearean/American English. I'm working with the developers, so I should know. Remember: there is no rule saying things in Europe use British English. Europe is not part of the British Empire. Best, PeterH2 (talk) 14:46, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

More on spelling... Where the name of the project was given using "centre" or "Centre", I have changed it to "Center". From my study of the wikipedia style guidelines, it seems to me proper that the spelling be consistent with the earliest usage in the article history, when it was renamed to "Okhta Center." The official project documents are in Russian, so there is no official Latin-alphabet spelling of the project name. I have retained the British spelling in citations and other uses of the word "centre" in proper names or titles. Etudiant (talk) 17:59, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Continuing the theme... an editor of this page changed "maximize" to "maximise" and "farther" to "further". I reverted back to the American English forms. In its history, the article has generally conformed to American English, and should remain consistent (see Manual of Style, National varieties of English, Retaining the existing variety). In particular, while "further" is preferred in British usage, "farther" is completely understandable, whereas in American usage "further" does not apply to physical distances. Note that the non-American spelling "metre" is used in this article, in conformance with international standards for naming of units of measure. Etudiant (talk) 00:10, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

While it's true that the official documentation is in Russian, there is an official English-language website, which calls the place "Lakhta Center" and uses AE spelling throughout (e.g. "favorable conditions"). That reinforces your conclusion that our article should be in AE per the MoS. JamesMLane t c 04:54, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please Fix

Someone please fix the formatting. Thank you. Jakebarrington (talk) 03:50, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done Etudiant (talk) 23:01, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Separate topics

"Okhta Center" search currently redirects here. I would suggest to separate it into two articles, or at least rename it "Okhta Center" with a section on Lakhta as a final version of the project. OC was a huge controversy, and a very important example of corruption in Russia. LC is just a building. There are two separate articles in Russian Wikipedia.Cosainsé (talk) 16:14, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is interesting that Russian Wikipedia has separate articles. It is in fact a single project whose site was changed by a few kilometers, and a very large and impactful project at that. I changed the page title to reflect the project's actual name -- "Okhta Center" is historical, and does not refer to anything now in existence -- and that it is no longer Okhta Center is a very significant development, in terms of controversy, public and international reaction, and the light it sheds on the problem of corruption. It seems to me that the "Okhta Center" redirect to this page, with its explanation of how the site and name have changed, and recounting of objections that were made about the Okhta site, respond to these concerns. Perhaps you would like to expand the article, to cover the political implications more clearly and thoroughly? Etudiant (talk) 23:08, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I would say that while "Okhta Center" does not refer to a specific building any more, it refers to the affair in general. Like Watergate does not really refer to the hotel, but to the scandal around it (there are two wiki pages about WG, by the way). I do plan on extending the article adding the political implication section (you can see that I left references in the appropriate sections). Hope to get to this soon! Cosainsé (talk) 01:47, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, right now the talk page from OC goes to LC. Do you know by any chance how to disconnect them to create a separate OC talk page?Cosainsé (talk) 01:52, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.designbuild-network.com/projects/okhta
Triggered by \bdesignbuild-network\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 10:17, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 13:18, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Awkward translation into English, odd structure

It seems that this article has been written in large part by non-native English speakers; there is a great deal of awkward phrasing, inappropriate capitalization, and poor style. It seems that a good dose of copy editing is in order. There are a few other issues with the structure as well, such as the entirely blank "Transportation development in Lakhta district due to the construstion of Lakhta Center" section. The 8 external project videos also make the article seem quite a bit like a promotion for the center, rather than an informative piece. Since I'm relatively new to editing, I thought I should post here before I dive in. Thoughts? Schnabeltiere (talk) 20:12, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is very poorly written, including much inappropriate use of prepositions and non-use of articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.53.14.246 (talk) 14:05, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Video

What are the thoughts on the video? Do they really make the page more informative and illustrative or would it be better to remove them? I added them to make the page more interactive and informative though thoughts and tastes may vary. As for structure of the article I do not find it odd but I acknowledge there may be some misphrasing. Wikipedia gives the right to edit articles to everyone so if you find editing necessary just go ahead, please. Kuskondu (talk) 17:19, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

zero cycle works

What is the purpose of zero cycle works explained in the article? I guess it has something to do with frozen soil in winter and its isolation. Could someone explain? Doblecaña (talk) 15:19, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Zero cycle works are the common name for all the underground construction operations, e.g. piling, pit excavation, foundation etc. Kuskondu (talk) 13:06, 29 January 2016 (UTC).[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lakhta Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120723110141/http://skyscrapercenter.com/List/future-tallest-100-buildings to http://skyscrapercenter.com/List/future-tallest-100-buildings

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:36, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lakhta Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070401024640/http://www.ohta-center.ru/ to http://www.ohta-center.ru/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:17, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]