Talk:Lake Street Transfer station/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 04:38, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

@John M Wolfson: Almost there. A comparatively small GA, but that's not an impediment; it just needs an alt tag and some comma removals and other cleanup. 7-day hold; ping me when done. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 04:53, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sammi Brie I have done all of what you suggested. In the future please feel free to make minor edits yourself; this applies to my featured content candidacies as well. In any event thank you for the quick and succinct review! – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 00:57, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copy changes

Add a comma before one block away
respectively constructed in 1893 and 1895 change to constructed in 1893 and 1895, respectively
Stations were regularly-spaced across the route, and included one on Wood Street Remove hyphen and comma
Remove comma after remain standing
Change were removed in the late 1950s to "was" to conform with "wooden material" (singular)

Other

The image is appropriately licensed but needs an alt tag. |alt=Refer to caption suffices here.
Earwig mostly catches organization names.
References archived.