Jump to content

Talk:Lake Büyükçekmece

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

width, surface, volume...

[edit]

Currently in the article, the size of the lake is said to be: Max. length 7 km

Max. width 2 km

Surface area 28.47 km2

Max. depth 8.6 m

Water volume 16,161 hm3 (3.877 cu mi)

This does not add up. A surface max 7km in length and 2km in width cannot have a surface of 28km2. A rectangle of 2*7 km would have 14km2, any bigger and either length or width is bigger than "max". With 14km2 and 8.6m average depth, volume would be 0,12 km3 and thats about 0,03 cubic miles. With 8.6 being the max. depth, volume would be even smaller. So, the numbers of 16,161 hm3 (whatever that is, 100*100*100??) "or" 3.877 don't add up either.

At least some of the numbers are seriously wrong. According to Google Maps length and width are at least in the ballpark, so probably area and volume are wrong. Who has got better information? --Schnederpelz (talk) 14:45, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Lake Büyükçekmece. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:11, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]