Talk:Lago di Bientina

Lago di Bientina has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 13, 2020. (Reviewed version).

Lago di Bientina received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

A fact from Lago di Bientina appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 22 May 2018 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Lago di Bientina was the largest lake in Tuscany until the beginning of a 300-year effort to drain it?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2018/May. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lago di Bientina.

Wikipedia

Lakes Low‑importance

	Lakes portal Lago di Bientina is within the scope of WikiProject Lakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lake-related articles on Wikipedia, using the tools on the project page. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LakesWikipedia:WikiProject LakesTemplate:WikiProject LakesLakes
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Suggestions and feedback from user MapReader for incorporation

You have chosen an interesting article, a lake that doesn't exist any more! I know Italy quite well but didn't know anything about it. What you have written looks good, although structured exclusively from a historical viewpoint. I know that malaria was a big problem historically for low lying parts of Italy, and I am sure the wider issue of eliminating it must be covered somewhere on WP; it would be good to cross-link to any such articles, for example History of malaria, . A citation for the early idea of draining in the 1500s would be helpful. A modern map showing the location would be good, if you can find one free of copyright restrictions. A section on the geography would be a useful addition - this could describe the location, and explain why a lake was there (i.e. where the water comes from and why it didn't drain away into a river). It would also be interesting to know what the area covered by the former lake is now used for (i.e. current land use). Otherwise, unless there is anything noteworthy to say about local geology, flora and fauna, or present day human activity, I think you have everything covered. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ganesha811 (talk • contribs) 18:04, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Lago di Bientina/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 16:47, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Looks interesting :) Happy to take this. Cheers, Sainsf · (How ya doin'?) 16:47, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sainsf, awesome! I should be available over the next few days to respond and make edits, though things are a little topsy-turvy at the moment. Thanks for reviewing the article. Ganesha811 (talk) 17:16, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No copyvio concerns, dablinks, duplinks or broken external links
Sourcing looks decent but inline citation missing for "Between 1915 and 1930, additional work...drainage under the Arno. "

Fixed - added reference.

A few things for citations:

Include translated titles (trans-title) and language parameters for foreign language sources
Avoid all caps
In ref 2 I think there should only be a "last" parameter and no "first", makes it look weird
Ref 9 needs more details

Fixed. I believe all these issues should now be addressed.

It was also known as Lago di Sesto This would look better if included in the previous line instead as "Lago di Bientina, also known as Lago di Sesto, ...."

Fixed. Edited.

Citations should usually be absent from the lead, and all the points mentioned there should be in the main text as well.
tHe lead should be expanded by a few more lines to include major details throughout the article like "Due to regular flooding and the fact ...improving the drainage of the lake began in the 1500s". Basically it should be a complete picture of the main text

Fixed. I've rewritten the lead to address the two points above. Let me know if it's now suitably improved!

It would be interesting to add the English translation or meaning of the name if possible

Comment: Agreed, but I can't find a reliable source. The Italian version of the article states that Lago di Sesto (sesto = sixth) comes from the sixth mile marker on a road through the valley, but it's unsourced and I can't find a source to back it up. Ganesha811 (talk) 16:26, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A link for Monte Carlo?

Fixed - added link.

come in the 7th century AD I think "date back to the 7th..." sounds better

Fixed. - Edited.

7th century AD and mid-eighth century - two ways of putting numbers less than ten. MOS recommends words for such numbers but it isn't strict, just consistency is required.

Fixed. Edited.

and in 1907 it was necessary "and by 1907 it became necessary" sounds better

Fixed. Edited.

Maybe link "reclamation"

Fixed. Added link.

That should be it. A well-written, interesting article :) Cheers, Sainsf · (How ya doin'?) 08:11, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The changes look great, especially the lead :) The point about the translation of the name may be ignored it we don't have good sources. Just one more point I noticed.. "Canale Imperiale" and any other foreign language words should be in italics consistently throughout the article. I didn't check for other examples but this Canal name is in italics in lead but not in main text. Plus it would be great to add translations like you do for La Botte in the lead (not sure about all other foreign terms but it would be great if we can do it for most terms to enhance readability). Cheers, Sainsf · (How ya doin'?) 17:54, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sainsf, thanks for the feedback! I'll make these edits now. :) Ganesha811 (talk) 01:48, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Made consistent as per reviewer comment.

Great. Ready for promotion :) Sainsf · (How ya doin'?) 01:58, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ganesha811 Ooops sorry did not notice you had already finished - also my edit should have had a comment that I found a couple of things unclear as a first time reader.Chidgk1 (talk) 14:47, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]