Talk:Lady Apache/GA1
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 14:31, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.
If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)
I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.
Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs)
Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.
Immediate Failures
[edit]It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria
-It contains copyright infringements
-It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include{{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar tags. (See also {{QF-tags}}).
-It is not stable due to edit warring on the page.
-
Links
[edit]Prose
[edit]Lede
[edit]- Do we need to link Mexican? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:40, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- González's ring name comes from the "family name" of Mario Balbuena González who wrestled under the name Gran Apache; whom she was married to when she made her wrestling debut in 1986, but later divorced. - I'd move this down, and explain a bit better, it's a bit confusing. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:40, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- First paragraph is about the lineage, rather than what they are notable for. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:40, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- Infobox is full of citations, most could be in prose. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:40, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
General
[edit]- Mexico City, Mexico[1] - missing punct. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:44, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- ring name Gran Apache. - reword to avoid SEAOFBLUE. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:44, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- career, and married - remove comma. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:44, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- Electroshock / Mr. Electro - could we write this in prose rather than like this? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:44, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- No images at all in this article? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:44, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- Could we explain what Luchas de Apuestas is in that section? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:44, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- Is there nothing we could use for a professional wrestling persona section? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:44, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Review meta comments
[edit]- I'll begin the review as soon as I can! If you fancy returning the favour, I have a list of nominations for review at WP:GAN and WP:FAC, respectively. I'd be very grateful if you were to complete one of these if you get time. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:31, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
- Mostly issues with the lede, which needs tightening up. Placing on hold. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:44, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- I don't really have good sources on her ring persona, not enough to build a whole section IMO. I have addressed the rest I think. MPJ-DK (talk) 02:20, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
- That's a shame - hopefully in the future there will be a bit more on this. Otherwise, I'm happy to promote. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 08:08, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
- I don't really have good sources on her ring persona, not enough to build a whole section IMO. I have addressed the rest I think. MPJ-DK (talk) 02:20, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
- Mostly issues with the lede, which needs tightening up. Placing on hold. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:44, 4 October 2020 (UTC)