Talk:Labyrinth Lord

This article was nominated for deletion on 26 July 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Role-playing games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of role-playing games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Role-playing gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Role-playing gamesTemplate:WikiProject Role-playing gamesrole-playing game
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dungeons & Dragons Bottom‑importance

This article is within the scope of the Dungeons & Dragons WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dungeons & Dragons-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, or join the discussion, where you can join the project and find out how to help!Dungeons & DragonsWikipedia:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsTemplate:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsDungeons & Dragons

Bottom

This article has been rated as Bottom-importance on the project's importance scale.

D&D to-do:

view

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Merge : Various articles
Stubs : Dungeoneer's Survival Guide, Swords & Spells, Variant Dungeons & Dragons games, More...
Update : Rewrite to be out-of-universe: Companions of the Hall, Dark Sun, Elf (Dungeons & Dragons)
Verify : add sources to novels planned for merge to List of Dragonlance novels
Other : Collaboration: Dave Arneson, Drow (Dungeons & Dragons)

Comments

Dangerously close to just an advertisement for Labyrinth Lord. I don't particularly care, but eventually someone will raise the issue here. If anyone is editing this, it would be good to trim out statements that read like sales literature and stick to facts. 173.170.154.235 (talk) 23:10, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion

Since the article is up on AfD, I'm going to start doing some surgery. There's a lot of extraneous info and it reads a little too much like an advertisement, so I'm going to cut a lot of that and add whatever sources I can find. zorblek (talk) 19:06, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

More power to you. :) 204.153.84.10 (talk) 19:24, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Deletionist point is irrelevant and if this article is deleted then the entirety of wikipedia should be considered for deletion. This article pertains to a game and is in no way any more an advertisement than any other roleplaying game or most games or hobbies for that matter. Further steps to delete this will push for a deletion of Wikipedia as a whole across the board. If each article is under such scrutiny wikipedia is no longer necessary. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Forvalaka (talk • contribs) 20:14, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well now, that's just hyperbole. I do feel the article has a place here, and so far the AFD respondents seem to mostly agree, so let's see how much the article can be improved in the meantime. 24.148.0.83 (talk) 02:20, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hyperbole is exaggerating and I am suggesting that if the Deletionists just "arbitrarily" decide what to remove, then Wikipedia, as a whole, no longer has a purpose and as such, I challenge the need for it. If facts can be randomly deleted, then what is the purpose of Wikipedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Forvalaka (talk • contribs) 04:23, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]