Talk:Labor history of the United States
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Labor history of the United States article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months |
The article List of striking US workers by year, Bureau of Labor Statistics (1916 - present) was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 3 August 2023 with a consensus to merge the content into Labor history of the United States. If you find that such action has not been taken promptly, please consider assisting in the merger instead of re-nominating the article for deletion. To discuss the merger, please use this talk page. Do not remove this template after completing the merger. A bot will replace it with {{afd-merged-from}}. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Proposed merge of List of striking US workers by year, Bureau of Labor Statistics (1881 - present) into Labor history of the United States
[edit]- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- To not merge; significant recent improvement (since AfD) now warrants a stand-alone article. Klbrain (talk) 18:32, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
From AfD close. Heart (talk) 03:56, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
- I would oppose a merger now, because the article stands Striking US workers by year on its own and uses BLS as a high quality source. It satisfies WP:LIST and lists strikes, which is different from a general labor history that is in prose format
- ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 23:29, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
- I oppose the merger on the basis of the article being sufficiently developed at this point to stand on it's own. As became the general agreement among most near the end of the initial discussion.
- - LoomCreek (talk) 04:31, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose The article is far different than the one that went to AFD. It went from 5,080 bytes to the 22,792 bytes its at now. I started added in links to various articles for different strikes, LoomCreek then did the rest of the work. Too much valid content to merge over. Dream Focus 18:26, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
article should be renamed to "Organized Labor history of the United states"
[edit]I was expecting to read about the history of US labor in general. but the article focused only on unions and organized labor. 149.88.27.149 (talk) 02:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- B-Class Chicago articles
- Low-importance Chicago articles
- WikiProject Chicago articles
- B-Class socialism articles
- Mid-importance socialism articles
- WikiProject Socialism articles
- B-Class organized labour articles
- High-importance organized labour articles
- WikiProject Organized Labour articles
- B-Class history articles
- Mid-importance history articles
- WikiProject History articles
- B-Class United States articles
- Mid-importance United States articles
- B-Class United States articles of Mid-importance
- B-Class United States History articles
- Mid-importance United States History articles
- WikiProject United States History articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- B-Class sociology articles
- Mid-importance sociology articles