Talk:Labor Notes

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Organized Labour Low‑importance

	Organized Labour portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article hijacked?

Someone has redirected the labor notes page (describing the 1800s currency movement) and redirected to this page implementation.

Wikipedia pages such as Utopia, Ohio pointed to the labor notes page, not this one.

Since labor notes (as Cincinnati Time Store notes) predate the magazine and organized labor group by 150 years, and have broader notability today. I felt it best to remove the redirect, and created a disambiguation page for labor notes, with options to go to Labor Notes (organization) or labor notes (currency).

rhyre (talk) 15:35, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Citations Needed (rather badly, at that)

I can't find a single citation in the article.<br. />--NBahn (talk) 02:48, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You can link to a book I wrote, Grassroots Journalism. It has a section on Labor Notes. --Eesha Williams 8/18/2018 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 8.224.4.4 (talk) 13:50, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Over four years later, it still reads bascially like an advertisment for this publication/group. 2600:1004:B118:340:D8B7:1FF1:4B5B:49A8 (talk) 21:33, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Labor Notes (organization). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20050626075347/http://www.troublemakershandbook.org/Text/Reviews/CWA%20review.htm to http://www.troublemakershandbook.org/Text/Reviews/CWA%20review.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:13, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]