Talk:La Toya Jackson discography
Oh dear, she has the worst discography ever!
- LOL I know this isn't a forum, but exactly what I was thinking. ELEVEN albums and not one made the top 100? What a pointless woman.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the La Toya Jackson discography article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Explanations for revisions March 29 2007 21:24
[edit]To user :Rhythmnation2004: I've been collecting vinyl since you were still in your diapers, I have much more knowledge on this subject than you ever will. 3,000 copies of the album Formidable were printed, and NO, they were not all sold, you have no solid evidence to back this up. "Men Be Illin'" was never released, it has absolutely no reason at all to be where it is. Having read the guidelines which you haven't, it's clear that you can't make a complaint about editing, you have nothing to back up your information, unless you have billboard soundscan charts that tell us exactly how many albums each has sold, DO NOT post false numbers on wikipedia. If you keep doing this I will keep changing it. --Vinylcollector82 05:16, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- There were 3,000 copies of Formidable pressed. All of them were sold. You are welcome to contact the Moulin Rouge in Paris if you need clarification at +33.01.53.09.82.82. Rhythmnation2004 01:20, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
- Whether they were sold or given can be debated, the album did not register on Nielson Soundscan. They could say they sold 20,000 copies of it, we would not know. 3000 were pressed supposedly, yet this album is extremely scarce. Please add a reliable reference to the numbers you posted.--Vinylcollector82 06:18, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
- The Moulin Rouge company will be happy to confirm that 3,000 copies were pressed and sold. You may contact them at +33.01.53.09.82.82. Rhythmnation2004 20:00, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Explanations for revisions March 29 2007 21:24
[edit]To user 74.99.219.28: Please refrain from editing pages when you have no knowledge in that subject area. 3,000 copies of the album Formidable were printed, and all of them were sold. Common sense tells you that this means the worldwide sales of Formidable are 3,000. In addition, "Men Be Illin'" is a true song that deserves a spot on this page, and it most definetely belongs in that particular spot. If you continue to shove your personal opinions on La Toya Jackson onto Wikipedia, the issue will be discussed with an administrator and you most certainly will be banned from Wikipedia. Rhythmnation2004 21:27, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Explanations for Revisions - May 9, 2007
[edit]To the user NRGKutKlose: your information on single releases is incorrect. The song "Playboy" was released on the Bad Girl but was never released as a single. In addition, the track "Why Don't You Want My Love?" is not from the album No Relations. It was released on one album, and that would be an album entitled Why Don't You Want My Love?, which is actually a re-issue of the Bad Girl album. This is why the track "Why Don't You Want My Love?" is listed under Bad Girl. The song has no association whatsoever with "No Relations". In addition, there is no sources to confirm that La Toya Jackson sold 100,000 copies. Thanks for your contributions but please make sure you are correct before editing. Rhythmnation2004 01:36, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Unspecified source for Image:A no-relations.jpeg
[edit]I found Image:A no-relations.jpeg and noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. Someone will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If it was obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If there are other files on this page, consider checking that they have specified their source and are tagged properly, too. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:03, 25 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 05:03, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:A no-relations.jpeg
[edit]Image:A no-relations.jpeg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 05:03, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Page vandalized?
[edit]Not sure I'm reading it right, but it looks like someone decided she's going to have #1 hits from now until the 2070s. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:2C5:0:715F:F55A:222C:BAA2:3615 (talk) 07:50, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on La Toya Jackson discography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100904070236/http://www.freewebs.com/latoya-jackson-fans/vhsdvd.htm to http://www.freewebs.com/latoya-jackson-fans/vhsdvd.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:48, 15 December 2017 (UTC)