Talk:La Llamada

La Llamada has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 24, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed
July 27, 2012	Good topic candidate	Not promoted

Current status: Good article

Latin music: Regional Mexican music Low‑importance

	Latin music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Latin music (music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and the languages of Ibero-America, see project scope for more details) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latin musicWikipedia:WikiProject Latin musicTemplate:WikiProject Latin musicLatin music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Regional Mexican music task force.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:La Llamada (Selena song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hahc21 (talk · contribs) 03:45, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review

Background and composition

This section has its first 9 sentences unsourced. Some of them might be covered by the liner notes, but i have my doubts over the next:

""La Llamada" was the first song recorded for Live! (1993)."
"The song was intended to be one of three studio tracks for Selena's Live! album."
"Astudillo and Quintanilla III had spent an hour writing a song together."
"They wanted to write a song that many woman face with their boyfriends. Quintanilla III had wanted to empower woman letting them know that they should hold their heads up and remember that life goes on." and
"Selena favored the lyrical content and central theme, which she commonly done in her career."
- Yes they all belong to FN#1 Selena's family and friends gave commentaries for each track. Jonayo! ^{Selena 4 ever} 16:14, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  Ok. Great. —Hahc 21 16:24, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Critical

"Sue Anne Pressley of the Chicago Sun-Times believed "La Llamada" is a "fan favorite"," >> "Sue Anne Pressley of the Chicago Sun-Times believed "La Llamada" to be a "fan favorite"," or "Sue Anne Pressley of the Chicago Sun-Times believed that "La Llamada" is a "fan favorite","
- Done Jona yo! ^{Selena 4 ever} 16:14, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"though commented that the song is the least memorable song on Live!." >> "commented that it was the least memorable song on Live!."

Why? How can someones comments towards a song they criticize be past-tense? I can't find any source that indicated s/he changed their minds, so the sentence would have to be in present-tense tone. Jonayo! ^{Selena 4 ever} 16:14, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Ups. What I meant is that you used "the song" twice too closely: "that the song is the least memorably song..."
  Done Jona yo! ^{Selena 4 ever} 02:45, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Charts

Split table into two: each one for each year. Also, why it says "Unknown" on the peak for "US Billboard Regional Mexican Digital Songs"? Until the chart position is available, the chart entry must go.

—Hahc 21 05:22, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(a) please look at this FA song, (b) the peak positions are only available for subscribers which I am not, so it's a Billboard chart which makes it notable enough for inclusion unless there are guidelines that suggest otherwise? Jona yo! ^{Selena 4 ever} 16:14, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but all those entries has their respective positions. I know some of the charts are subsc-only, but if you cannot look at the position, then you may not include it until you find it, since it's useless to say it charted on A if you do not provide the peak. —Hahc 21 16:18, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can you further explain please? I don't see any difference from the FA song article to this one. Best, Jona yo! ^{Selena 4 ever} 17:52, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On Single Ladies (Put a Ring on It), all charts has their correct peak position. Example: Czech Airplay Chart, the position is No.13; Japan Hot 100, the position is No.25. None of the charts there says "unknown" on the "peak position" field. —Hahc 21 19:49, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Because Jivesh can find those sources using Billboard, however, the site does not include many other charts such as the one listed here. It is a notable chart, solely because it is published by Billboard, so me just removing a chart the song peaked on makes no sense. Right now the peak is not, and maybe, never will be available but I see no guideline that states charts with unknown peak positions should be removed. Best, Jona yo! ^{Selena 4 ever} 02:45, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey why did you removed it? I was looking for if it could be kept or not. Well, sorry for the delay. All has been fixed. I'll be in touch to find an answer for the chart "curiosity", if I can call it that way. —Hahc 21 23:25, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It'll go on hold until those issues are solved and i'll provide more comments. —Hahc 21 05:24, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I left comments. Best, Jona yo! ^{Selena 4 ever} 16:14, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

All fixed. I'm passing. And, hey, Poquita Ropa is ready? —Hahc 21 23:25, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm heading that way now. Best, Jona yo! ^{Selena 4 ever} 23:28, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 06:56, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

La Llamada (Selena song) → La Llamada – Currently, La Llamada redirects to El Avion De Las Tres. As Selena song is the primary topic, a dablink will be enough. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 17:33, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nominator. Erick (talk) 00:38, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support Jona ^{talk to me} 02:20, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on La Llamada. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/charts/chart-search-results/singles/11947298

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:23, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]