Talk:LaRouche movement/Archive 6
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 |
Examiner?
Apparently examiner.com is considered a bad source for Wikipedia? Anyone know why? If an exception can be made for a particular page, this article could be useful here: http://www.google.com/search?client=opera&q=%22Banking+on+Congress,+%E2%80%98Week+of+Action%E2%80%99+begins+Monday+in+D.C.%22&sourceid=opera&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&channel=suggest (this is the only way I can manage to put a link here. Someone must really dislike the Examiner.)
Joe Bodacious (talk) 20:06, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
- http://www.sfweekly.com/2007-12-05/news/blogos-free/ is a good read for why the examiner.com is a bad source.Serialjoepsycho (talk) 00:13, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
- People coming from Examiner.com created a huge mess on Wikipedia some years back when they were spamming Examiner links into many, many articles. It turned out that they were trying to get more eyeballs on their articles because they were then paid more by advertisers. That practice left Wikipedia with a very scornful attitude toward the blogging website, aside from the obvious problem that there is no editorial oversight.
- Regarding the linked article by Kenric Ward, called "Banking on Congress, ‘Week of Action’ begins Monday in D.C.", published this time last year, I don't see any compelling reason to try and get the blacklist lifted. The only thing it says about LaRouchism is that Paul Gallagher, LaRouchite economics editor, thinks that Glass–Steagall Legislation should be restored for a healthy American economy. Gallagher's views are not analyzed—they are presented verbatim—so this is a primary source. Binksternet (talk) 02:54, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on LaRouche movement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071112063307/http://larouchepac.com:80/pages/otherartic_files/2006/060626_cody_jones.htm to http://www.larouchepac.com/pages/otherartic_files/2006/060626_cody_jones.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090620200241/http://www.larouchepac.com:80/pages/breaking_news/2007/04/28/wyneal.shtml to http://www.larouchepac.com/pages/breaking_news/2007/04/28/wyneal.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:39, 26 January 2016 (UTC)