Talk:LaPorte County, Indiana

United States: Indiana / U.S. counties Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Indiana portal This article is supported by WikiProject Indiana (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. counties.

Removed Statement re county number

I'm not sure how prior to 2008 La Porte county was the 45th county alphabetically in Indiana. If you're counting the space in the word, then presumably La Porte would have to be number 44, as Lagrange county (typically never having had a space) would be 45 and Lake 46. In any case, it was a confusing, unsourced, fairly irrelevant statement which I think may have been connected somehow to the county numbers that used to appear on license plates, hence the 2008 reference. These numbers still exist on license plates (although smaller and hard to read) and Indiana judiciary uses the county number system when assigning case numbers for courts eg. La Porte circuit = 46C01 etc. So if La Porte was and continues to be #46, I don't see the need to confuse. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.167.110.28 (talk • contribs) 21:41, 13 September 2009

Name

What is the consensus with the name? People keep revising it from 'La Porte' to 'LaPorte' and vice versa. I think both are acceptable, but should there be some consistency? I understand that 'Laporte' is not acceptable, however as an interesting note, many early people in the county used this spelling. If you review the first commissioners record dated from 1836 (located in the circuit courthouse), they frequently use 'Laporte'. Personally my vote would be for 'La Porte'. If you break down the word in an etymological sense, then in French the phrase is two distinct words. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.167.110.28 (talk • contribs) 21:41, 13 September 2009

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Not moved. bd2412 T 20:43, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

LaPorte County, Indiana → La Porte County, Indiana – The sources I am seeing such as here spell it La Porte. That's also how the city article spells the name. Relisted Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:04, 12 January 2014 (UTC) Candleabracadabra (talk) 17:07, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, as the official county website, the U.S. Census Bureau, and the U.S. Board on Geographic Names all spell the name as a single word. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 20:51, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, although the county website you site lookd like a cheap contract job and the other two sources don't look much more definitive. Several other reliable sources spell it with a space, including Google Maps. I guess it's not even a problem limited to this community see here for example. I do think it's amusing that the city is spelled one way and the county another. The arguments and sources for La Porte seem more convincing to me, but unless others agree I suppose it can remain as is. Candleabracadabra (talk) 22:49, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on LaPorte County, Indiana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:13, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on LaPorte County, Indiana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6098KFs5E?url=http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/18/18091.html to http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/18/18091.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:12, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Adjacent Counties

Material has been added three times by IP(s), reverted three times by two different editors, that Cook county, Illinois is adjacent to La Porte County. This is fundamentally untrue. In one of the edit summaries adding the material, the editor said that:

Cook county, Illinois can be viewed from Lake Michigan in Michigan city. You can see on the berrien county Page that is says the same thing

In the original reversion I made, I pointed out that:

Cook county is not an adjacent county. The reason Cook county is adjacent to Berrien county is that they share a water boundary on Lake Michigan. La Porte county does not share a water boundary with Illinois

I would ask the editor(s) to please consider the above explanation as to why the material is being removed, and please join the discussion here before adding the material again. RandomGnome (talk) 02:18, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]